Showing posts with label Alex Ferguson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alex Ferguson. Show all posts

United's Decline. How United Have Regressed Tactically Since Quieroz


In 2002 Alex Ferguson made a bold and visionary decision to bring in Carlos Quieroz as his assistant and also as his successor at Old Trafford. It was a masterstroke in terms of modernising Man United in order to do more in Europe and to take them into the 21st century. Yet ten years later and United are back to their pre-Quieroz, British style, which is not good news for United fans.



Man United almost ended the season as English Champions; a matter of minutes separated them from glory and then in a fleeting moment, the title was gone. Losing the title however was possibly the best thing to happen to United, as it may have allowed Ferguson to stress to the board that this team needs strengthening. With the arrival of Kagawa it appears that United are certainly looking to improve, yet this is just one of many United fans should be hoping arrive this summer. 


The issue of United’s inability to compete with Chelsea, Madrid, Barca and importantly Man City means that Ferguson needs to be shrewder in the market; Kagawa is a good acquisition, mainly because he gives United something they lack, creativity and guile. Investment is important and smart investment is even more key, United need to do something to stay with the big spenders. Yet the reason why United are falling further away from their elite rivals has to do with their tactics as much as the quality of their players.


Enter a vision

In 2002 Carlos Quieroz arrived at Old Trafford to replace Steve McLaren, he had previously been coaching the national sides of UAE and South Africa and Ferguson sought to bring in a coach who could replicate and further the work of McLaren. He did an excellent job in his first year and United brought the title back to Old Trafford, snatching it from Arsenal in the 02/03 season. 


In that following summer, United would embark on a new approach to how they played the game, out went the poster boy Beckham and in came Cristiano Ronaldo. There was talk before Ronaldo arrived that Ronaldinho and Arjen Robben were been sought to come to Old Trafford, for whatever reason this didn't happen, yet what these targets indicated was that the classic United style of play was about to change; favouring dribblers over crossers. 


That summer however Quieroz’s was sought by Real Madrid and he left United to go manage them 2003. Unfortunately for him though his time there was not a positive one and he returned as United’s assistant that following summer, just as Rooney was being signed from Everton. Reforming the old partnership with Alex Ferguson proved an attractive option to both sides; United had trailed 15 points behind Arsenal, and Ferguson was forced to bring in temporary help from Walter Smith during the tough end of season run-in. Subsequently, Queiroz returned to United as assistant manager in July 2004, signing a three year deal.

Ronaldo's first season at Old Trafford was a difficult one; a boy who appeared to be very skilful yet too selfish with the ball, seemingly happier to beat a player than create goal scoring chances and after the productive quality of Beckham led many to question the logic of United’s acquisition and their vision for the future. With the return of Quieroz however Ronaldo had a man who could teach and educate him to further his game and develop him into one of the world's best. Although that following season no trophies were won, United were developing a new style, and Ferguson appeared willing to be patient in order build and develop their excellent youth players in Ronaldo and Rooney. 


Some important factors affected the coming seasons; it can be argued that United’s success was down to the arrivals of Van Der Sar, Vidic and Evra, who brought stability to what was at times a leaky defence. And in November 2005 United made their most decisive decision, they released Roy Keane from the club. It was Queiroz who was heavily rumoured to be one of the main reasons for team captain Roy Keane's departure from Manchester United. According to Keane, he did not like the tactics that Quieroz employed and he also did not like the way he was given so much responsibility as if he were manager of the club. This was a clear indication that the old school United mentality was being phased out; Beckham, Phil Neville, Nicky Butt and now Keane were all moved on, it was an indication that Ferguson was willing to trust the vision of Quieroz and create a side capable of not just dominating England, but Europe.


A transformation from British to European

One of the major criticisms of Ferguson has been his failings in Europe, four finals reached in his lengthy career at United does seem a too few compared to the dominance that United have had in England. It was clear that the coaching of Kidd and McLaren, although successful, meant that United lacked the edge and understanding of the European game. This is why I believe Quieroz was brought in; to make United dominant in Europe by modernizing their style.

Quieroz transformation of the side was complete in the summer of 2006 when Ruud Van Nistelrooy was moved on, citing issues between him and Ronaldo, whose late delivery meant Ruud was not receiving the right service. Ferguson chose Ronaldo and that following season United not only won the league, but did it in style. Ronaldo scored 23 goals in all competitions, almost as many as he had done in the previous three seasons. 


What was clear was that Ronaldo was now the goal scorer, yet his position was from the right wing. This evolution of style was away from United’s wide play tactic of crossing and finishing. Ronaldo was now instructed to stay wide and drive inside, with the single mentality of scoring goals. Quieroz clearly saw the way football was developing and the use of inverted wingers, those who cut inside not out, and who seek to score not provide, was what Ronaldo was groomed to be. We see this commonly now with Robben, Di Maria and Messi and it appears Quieroz saw the future of football and where the game was heading.


The frustration which Ronaldo had served the fans previously was now rewarded with goals and success. He picked up the PFA players player of the year award, the young player of the year award and fans player of the year award. Ronaldo was also one of eight United players named in the 06/07 Team of the season (where the back four and GK were picked). It was clear that Quieroz had succeeded in transforming this side from a rigid, 4-4-2 force into one which was now fluid and flexible. He had been given time to evolve the side to become more dynamic and altered the style to reflect the more open and progressive play of the Dutch and Barcelona.

In 2007/08 Ronaldo won the European Golden Shoe, the first winger to receive this award. It just showed how far United had come in terms of their progressive style, their winger was now their forward and the side was created to get the best from Ronaldo. Often the ball would be played down the left, it would then be switched long to Ronaldo who would be hugging the right touchline, his immaculate touch and then speed and skill would frighten the full backs and his ability to drive and shoot at speed with power and precision meant he was the most frightening player in the world. Pure perfection and all credit to Quieroz in making this possible.

United won the title three times in a row from 2006-2009 and it was apparent that Ferguson’s own vision to evolve the side and create a truly modern European side was vindicated. Quieroz was the architect, he solidified the defence and created an attacking foursome which was fluid, creative and ruthless. 


The creator leaves & old ways return

In 2008 amid rumors of an opening as the Portuguese National Coach, Alex Ferguson started to push for Queiroz to be his successor as manager at Old Trafford and discouraged any possible suitors from approaching him. However, rumours over the summer of 2008 continued to link Queiroz with the Portugal national football team managers' role, following the departure of Luiz Felipe Scolari and in July 2008, Manchester United agreed to release Queiroz from his contract and he was appointed manager for the Portuguese national team. 


This was a major loss for United and Ferguson, he clearly was grooming him as his replacement, he had handed over much responsibility and he had allowed Quieroz to evolve the style of the side. Ferguson should have done more to keep Quieroz, perhaps even stepping aside to allow him to manage the club, instead he left the current Champions Leagues winners, and his departure would mean a gradual decline in style, quality and success. 

United were unable to keep Quieroz for the 08/09 season yet they did keep Ronaldo, and they almost won the Champions League again, losing to Barcelona in the final in Rome. Yet losing Ronaldo and Tevez that following summer meant the team which Quieroz had perfected were no longer. The new assistant Mike Phelan, who replaced Quieroz, is the reason I believe that United increased their gap between the top sides and theirselves. In the Champions League final in Rome Barcelona showed the world that they were in fact the rising side of Europe and that their style was the one which served a method for success. If Quieroz had been there would it have been different? Would they have been tactically better than they were that night? I believe so.


For me this Barcelona style could have been United, they were progressing to this way of playing, yet the departure of Quieroz was a damaging blow which I don’t believe many comprehend. When Portugal came calling Ferguson should have stepped down to allow him to take over and continue his great work. Losing Ronaldo was inevitable, yet Barcelona lost Ronaldinho remember,  yet it was who replaced these men that mattered. Antonio Valencia and Michael Owen showed a regression back to the old ways; Phelan clearly has an old coaching mentality and this shows in how United began to play. He replaced Ronaldo, an inside forward with Valencia, a classic winger. I rate Valencia highly, yet he was step backwards in terms of the modern game. 


I also believe that the arrivals of Nani and Anderson would have been more beneficial if Quieroz was there to nurture them, he clearly did that with Ronaldo and Rooney and his absence and ultimate influence has been lost on these players. Anderson particularly has had his creativity and guile coached out of him to become a continuity midfielder. This is sacrilege to what was one of the most promising attacking midfielders of his generation. And Nani possesses the skill yet lacks the focus which Ronaldo was given under the guidance of Quieroz. 


A widening gap of styles

Although success domestically has come under Phelan, United have not closed the gap on sides like Barcelona, but got further away. Now we see the emergence of Madrid, Bayern and now Man City. The quality of these sides is high yet the key factor is their style reflects the modern game; a modern 4-2-3-1 with four interchanging forwards creates problems for even the best defences. The key to this formation is the use of two holding players to prevent counter attacks, break up play and supply forwards. 


Yet as we see progressive tactics abroad, we see United have reverted back to a 4-4-1-1 which offers little creativity or variety. A formation which against the poor sides of the Premier League will work, yet as has been seen against sides like Bayern in 2010 and Barcelona in 2011, is ineffective against the top sides. Even sides like Newcastle and Wigan have outplayed United this season and this is because their style has become too predictable. 


This season has seen the worse United for over a decade, although their points tally was high, teams like Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea were distinctly poor and their only genuine rivals in City took 6 points from them. At the start of the 2011 season United were appearing to want to play open attacking football, yet the key to this tactic is having a stable defence behind it, in the 3-1 win over Chelsea it could easily have been a defeat and the final straw was the mauling against City at home. Whereas Quieroz had sorted the defence and made it organised, the new team of Phelan and Meulensteen had seemed to allow complete openness to come through the whole side. If you wish to play with four attacking players, then you must have a strong midfield and defensive stability, the 6-1 loss showed the lack of defensive organisation which was United's strength under Quieroz. 


Gary Neville has spoken of the methodical methods of Quieroz in training, it was modern football; fluid in attack, yet knowing your position and role. Just what Guardiola has done at Barcelona. Top level coaching is not just about choosing a side and playing, it is intricate and detailed, it is why Mourinho and Guardiola are the best right now, they focus on the detail. United clearly have lost their focus. Although they almost won the title still, performances in Europe indicated that this style will not lead to success and I anticipate City and Chelsea being much better next season.

Can they re-modernise?

The arrival of Kagawa shows an intent of a willingness to play a more creative and fluid attacking system, Antonio Valencia has shown he is capable of driving inside aswell as out and United will need to play more in this style if they wish to go further in Europe. Mike Phelan and Rene Meulensteen are answerable for what happens at United now, I have my doubts about Phelan’s capabilities in such an illustrious role and really question Ferguson’s decision to regress the style of play, it seemed just as United were about to peak they reverted back to the old way. It is not easy to choose an assistant, you need to trust them implicitly, yet it is important to choose a man with vision and an understanding of the modern game. Real success comes in Europe now, and United appear a long way off from getting close to a European crown at this time. For me, if they continue with a 4-4-1-1 philosophy then expect to go out early in Europe and to struggle in the league. 


People talk of the United way, yet right now that way is not right, much needs to be done this summer, it doesn’t need massive investment but it does need vision; in Kagawa I see a player similar to Silva, yet United more like that, more creativity, more guile, more fluidity. Yet they also need a defensive midfielder who is strong and disciplined, it is a position which has not been filled since Fletcher became injured and which is key for United in order to give Carrick the freedom to start attacks and the lack of a true defensive midfielder has allowed the good players to find space against United and punish them, surely lessons have been learnt?

In 2003 Ronaldo was purchased, a vision was laid down and with patience and guidance United became the best side in the world. I don’t see that vision today, young players have been brought in yet I don’t see the creativity of an Ozil, or the skill of a Messi in that side. What I see is continuity players, effective to a level, yet I thought United were more than that. I see a side holding on to their crown of England’s best, yet around them I see sides and coaches evolving and adapting to the modern game. Until United address this issue they will not be on top of Europe again and this must be a pressing concern for the fans. 





The Whitehouse Address is very passionate about the future of football and all that concerns. Whether from the grassroots to the senior game, there are issues, especially in England, which are not being addressed and because of this England is being left behind by the rest. If you have an opinion on what is said here then find me on Twitter and I will happily discuss @The_W_Address




  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Ferguson: "It's scary to think how far Messi"

Few coaches have had both the consequences of facing to Barca of Leo Messi. One is the Manchester United manager Alex Ferguson, who lost two Champions League finals at the '10' Argentina.

The Scot, one of the oldest and winners of the world, not out of his astonishment at all he has achieved and won the Barça star at a young age. With only 24, Messi has won every major titles at the club level possible: three Champions, five league titles and two World Cups, among others ... And not only that, but it's also the top scorer in the history of azulgrana entity, with 236 points.

"The players are developed and begin to mature when they reach 25 years or so. We've seen it with Cristiano Ronaldo, Wayne Rooney and others. But Messi has not even reached that age yet. Scary to think what might happen, only 24! "Ferguson said in remarks published Sunday on the web 'Mirror Football'. (via SPORT)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Is the sun setting on the dominance of the Red Devils?


United have dominated English football for twenty years, they currently lie top of the league. However, there is a sense of inevitability that Man City are about to overtake them as the best side in England. The question is, has Ferguson done enough to prevent this happening?



Rio Ferdinand made an interesting point this week about Man City, not about fans coming out the woodwork, but when he said of City winning the title, “fingers crossed we can delay that”. Did anyone feel surprised by this comment? Was this an admission that the future is blue and that a title win this season will be just delaying the inevitable? It was an acceptance from Ferdinand that City are the future of the English football. 

Manchester United have dominated England since the inception of the Premier League, with 12 league titles and potentially one more this season, their achievement is quite remarkable. When only three other sides have the won the league, with Arsenal and Chelsea winning it three times each and Blackburn achieving it once, then it really does show the complete dominance that United has had. 

The era of United's dominance has never seen them lauded for their style or quality. Instead more for their drive, hunger and never say die attitude. They reflect their manager in this respect and this "winning" mentality has been the reason for their supremity. Arsenal have been the side in recent seasons which captivate the imagination with beautiful football, yet have recently lacked the killer instinct necessary to sustain a title challenge, Chelsea's challenge to United appeared genuine and Mourinho in particular made things interesting for United, however with both of these sides, United and Ferguson have overcome them. However this season we have seen a new look City side receiving huge plaudits for their style of football. And yet, United are still the side favourites for the title. 

In my opinion this is probably the most average United side for a long time, their performances in Europe have shown that and the reason they are challenging has more to do with Alex Ferguson than the players; once again has been able to get the most out of a group of players which except for a few cannot be deemed top quality. He was again got them challenging for the title, though if United do win the league season then what does it really say about the standard of the English league?  

Why United have been poor

On the 28th May 2011 Manchester United were once again humbled by the best side in world football. The gulf between the sides was quite shocking, in their previous encounter in the 2009 final United lost yet this time was different. The 2011 game was a chance for Ferguson to show he had learnt from that defeat, that he had bridged the gap between the sides. In fact he had not learnt from that defeat, his side contained the same players (except for Ronaldo) and played the same way; which allowed too much room for the quality of Barcelona to exploit.

And so last summer some serious work was needed on a squad which clearly the lacked quality in key areas; a new goalkeeper was required to replace a retiring Van Der Sar and a centre midfielder was essential to compete with the likes of City, Madrid and Barca. Yet Ferguson decided to invest in the future of the side; De Gea was considered the best option for his potential more than his current form. This was a mistake, Van Der Sar’s arrival coincided with a period of success and finals. He was the first to properly replace Schmeichel because he had the experience required to play for a top side like United. It is common knowledge that a goalkeeper improves with age and Ferguson would have been better going for the available Martin Stekelenburg from Ajax, another Dutch keeper, 29 years of age with 40 caps for his country. He went to Roma for £5 million. This would have been a much better acquisition. 

The other two signings were interesting also; Phil Jones was admittedly brought in a year before Ferguson intended because his hand was forced due to other interest. His has shown he has lot’s of potential, yet lacks certain characteristics to be regarded as a top player now; a lack of tactical understanding, discipline and concentration have not helped United this season. Yet the worst signing was Ashley Young, at 26 years old he is not one for the future, and so one would expect more of him now, yet he lacks what is required for a top side, in the big games he struggles especially against good full backs. He showed his limitations at Villa yet Ferguson saw something in him, probably his crossing and set pieces, which made him think he was good enough for United. I believe Ferguson got these signings wrong and would have been suited to buy a player like Juan Mata or Shinji Kagawa instead of Young. Buying British is commendable yet quality is what was required to “compete” and “catch up” with Barcelona.

Wesley Sneijder is a player who was constantly linked to United last summer, yet the only thing that Sneijder would have offered would have been the fan fare it would have generated. There is a reason that he did not make it at Madrid and his success at Inter came when Mourinho revolved the side around him in order to bring out his best; he gave him midfield cover and a free role to play. Since Mourinho left, Sneijder has not been able to recapture that form, simply because he is not a team oriented player, he would not have adapted to United, especially as him and Rooney play similar roles. Ferguson dodged a bullet by not bringing in Sneijder yet has missed out on players who would have been ideal for his side in Samir Nasri or Mesut Ozil who would have been better purchases in the last two years for the attacking midfielder position. The fact they both chose other top clubs says a lot about the state of United.


Any positives?

In terms of the positives of this season, United have suffered major injury problems again and their depth has brought them through them. Losing Vidic was a major blow and Cleverley did appear to offer something new, the fact they are top of the table shows their amazing mental strength. Though there has been one player who has stood up above the rest this year, Antonia Valencia. He has been the difference and is the reason United are competing for the title. It is no surprise that Rooney is more prolific with Valencia in the side, last seasons injury coincided with a poor run of form of Rooney. And yet at the start of the season Valencia was playing at right back, allowing Ferguson to play his distinctly average signing Ashley Young out left and putting Nani right. 

The balance of the side was not right and the best winger should have been playing higher up. Pundits blamed the loss of Cleverly on United's dip in form, yet it was the absence of Valencia on the wing which was the major issue. This season he has 11 assists and 3 goals, a vital contribution from a player who I regard as the best winger in the English league. 

Danny Welbeck has also shown flashes of potential and much has been said about Paul Pogba. However, the key to potential is unlocking it and like too many players at United right now, lot's of talk of potential yet little show for it presently. 


So what now for United? 


There are many players who should be deemed surplus to requirements in the summer. Berbatov appears agreed to be set to leave; it is correct he should go yet it is a shame that he has not performed for United, as he clearly has the ability and class. I think Ferguson believed he would be the new Cantona, however his scoring record against top sides is laughable and Ferguson must be questioned for another big money flop. 

One of the reasons for Berbatov’s problem, was like that of Veron, that he wants to dictate the tempo, control the game. Both were not given this luxury for United, instead required to play the United way. And what is this way? Midfield players who are instructed to get the ball wide as soon as possible to fast wide players who look to provide crosses to the forwards. This has been the tactic and style of Ferguson for decades, simply it doesn't suit playmakers like Veron and Berbatov who want and require the play to go through them.

Two more who have not lived up to expectations are Nani and Anderson. Both were acquired in the summer of 2007, arriving for around £17 million each. They were regarded as the brightest talents in Portugal at that time, Nani being seen as the apparent heir to Ronaldo and the Brasilian Anderson regarded as one of the best young attacking midfielders in the world. Check out this video of Anderson as a youngster before his move, you’ll be amazed to see skill, speed and finishing abilities that many United fans have not seen at Old Trafford. 


Ferguson has ruined the potential of this player, his skill and creativity reduced to being a continuity player, spreading square passes to his wide players. It is a real shame to see such potential ruined. Ferguson has taken away what he was good at and reduced him to being a mediocre player. Nani performed well last season yet this season seems incapable of reproducing any of that form. Why did Ferguson buy them if all he wanted to was mould them into his specific British style? He should have changed his tactic to suit these players, not have them fit into round holes. Both of these players need to move, for their own careers more than anything else. 

One man who needs to go more than any other is Patrice Evra. Ever since the incident at the 2010 World Cup Patrice Evra has lost something, whether it’s drive or motivation, he appears devoid of work rate, concentration and quality. His decline has been one of the most shocking and tragic in recent memory. Yet he continues to play, even leading the side as captain. What Ferguson sees in him is puzzling, perhaps his loyalty stems from the racism incident or perhaps he doesn’t have an adequate replacement. Either way if Ferguson has any sense this summer must be the year when Evra is moved on and a replacement is bought in. Jordi Alba seems destined for Camp Nou yet United need only to look at Leighton Baines as a more than adequate replacement. For Baines himself he needs to move to a top club to achieve his potential and United will require him to replace the faltering Evra. 

The contribution of Paul Scholes and Ryan Giggs at Old Trafford has been nothing short of phenomenol. Ferguson is not wrong when he says that Scholes has been the best midfielder in England in the past twenty years. Yet Vieria also is not wrong of the impression that Scholes’ return has made on this United side. If Scholes was needed, and his appearances which indicate that he has been, then Ferguson clearly miscalculated last summer. In the past five years there has been too much reliance on these two, in effect stalling the required evolution of the side.


And so who and what is needed?


When looking at players for next season Ferguson has been reportedly interested in Eden Hazard at Lille. In my opinion this is the perfect player required for United, fast, skilful and creative, he can bring to United what Ronaldo did and give Rooney someone to link up with. Another option could be Shinji Kagawa who has been a revelation since his move to Dortmund, United have reportedly being looking at him already and he could offer a lot of speed, movement and creativity which United dearly lack. 

Behind them is needed a player in the mould of Michael Essien in his prime. A player who has shown his class and work rate this season, especially against United has been Chiek Tiote, available for around £12 million, he will give the United midfield what they lacked this season; drive,  strength and a good tackling ability combined with the ability to pass effectively. Javi Martinez is another who has been touted, yet I believe he is too similar to Carrick for them to be play together, yet as a replacement for him then he would be perfect.  Many fans will hope for Luka Modric, yet in my opinion United can do much more with £40 million.

Iker Muniain has been a revelation this season and would be someone that Ferguson should consider, yet if they were looking across at Bilbao, it is Fernando LLorente who would be an ideal fit to play with Rooney. At 27 he is in the prime of his career, he offers the talent and skill to play at the top level and has the strength and capabilities to deal with the Premier League. This is who United should seek to replace Berbatov with.  

Defensive issues

United have been so formidable in their Premier League career and it has mainly come from their strength in defence. This season however, their defence has not been as solid. There have been injuries to their captain Vidic and the inevitable decline of Ferdinand has thrown Smalling and Jones into the limelight, playing as either right back or centre back. They are not good enough at this time to be the first choice defenders for United. Especially in Europe, their inexperience was evident. 

There have been many pundits praising the performances of Jonny Evans lately, however I would disagree. Sure, his performance against Wolves was impressive, yet the team bottom of the league down to ten men, it doesn't get any easier.  The games against Bilbao really showed the deficiencies in the defence; long range shots were not closed down effectively, runners were not followed and players were able to run with the ball too easily into the attacking half . 

The Da Silva twins have shown that they are capable footballers, yet they are not defenders. The modern game requires full backs who can attack as much as they can defend, yet Rafael especially shows a real lack of discipline and control in his play, especially in and around the penalty box. With these two in the side, Man Utd don’t look comfortable, they are too eratic. Gary Neville offered consistency and reliability in a key position, as of yet United have not yet replaced him fully.


A change in style?

United's style has been questioned for years, they are efficient without really entertaining. However, when Carlos Quieroz was assistant, the year they won the Champions League in 2008, the style varied; an attacking four was given much more licence to roam and interchange positions. This is arguably the best football that United have played. 

And so what does the current style say about the current coach Mike Phelan? I have believed that since he has been assistant that United have been distinctly average, in their style and quality. Efficient of course, yet their predictable tactic has been found out on the European stage, this season especially. If United wish to compete with City and challenge in Europe again, then they require a coach who can modernise what is a very old fashioned United side. The game has evolved, tactics have moved on and fluidity has replaced static positioning. As the other sides around Europe improve, United continue their one style fits all way. 

The biggest barometer of United's gulf has been shown against sides from Spain. Since 2008, United have played 12 games against Spanish sides. Their record is W 2 D 6 L 7. This is significant as it shows that Ferguson has not been able to compete with the best country in the world. His last three games against Spanish sides, Barcelona at Wembley and the two legs against Bilbao have shown the gulf in talent, quality and tactics.

Spanish teams are able to move with the ball to create an opening for a pass, rather than just picking a man and passing to him. I think English teams in general struggle in dealing with this, due to the different nature of play in the Premiership. And conversely, I think Spanish teams have read the English style of play and are able to counter it. Has Ferguson adapted his tactic or style when playing against these sides, no, he sticks to his way and gets comprehensively beaten. This to me shows the difference between the quality of the league, of the players and importantly the coaches, where many in the game talk of the Spanish league being more tactical. I think we believe that it is just technical skills that they are superior in, yet they have a level of tactical understanding that our sides, fans and players don’t, or importantly don’t want to have.

Ferguson gets more from his players than almost any manager in the game, he values hard work and loyalty over anything else and this has contributed to the unity and togetherness that has been a hallmark of United. With the success that United have achieved domestically, one cannot ask many questions of Ferguson, yet has he done enough in Europe? Has he shown his  limitations on the European stage. I think so.  It would appear that he struggles against top coaches who are efficient tactically; think Mourinho, Guardiola and recently Bielsa. 


A change coming?

What do United and Ferguson need to do to put them back on the European stage? He has bought for the future, has some potentially excellent young players in his squad and possesses one of the only world class talents in the England side. However, things need to happen this summer; certain players need moving on and these will require replacing, and not with potential talent but with top talent. Players of quality to strengthen the first XI and give United the strength they had three years ago. 



They should consider changing their assistant Phelan and replace him with someone who is a quality coach and who knows Ferguson well. Perhaps even someone who Ferguson can groom to be his replacement. I believe that man should be Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. A former player who gave great service to the club, he also coached the reserves before going to Molde in Norway and winning the league. Contrary to other ex-United players, he has actually been successful. 


Keeping up pace?


Manchester United are arguably the biggest side in the world, they have dominated the English league for the past twenty years with one of the best managers in world football and Ferguson has done an excellent job of evolving his sides to meet an ever changing game and has blended youth and experience with almost seamless precision. However, Ferguson is closing in on his retirement and though his legacy will not be forgotten, is he capable of keeping up with City and Barcelona?

He promised that he learnt from the defeats to Barca, however this season would appear not to show that; poor signings and predictable tactics have resulted in a poor European campaign and have prompted many to question how good United are. Many will put United's success more to Ferguson’s drive and determination than to the quality of his players, I would agree and would also say that Ferguson has been the reason for the lack of quality in the team. He has made mistakes with a lot of money in the transfer market and I believe he now questions his own decisions, believing that there “is no value in the market”.

Somehow he has worked his magic on this side to have them challenging for the title again. However, many of his players lack the required quality to give Ferguson another Champions League. When looking at the top sides around Europe United are far behind in terms of quality, depth and style. European football and success is the benchmark of a top side, two finals in three years indicates a side that was up there with the best. Yet, the manner of the losses to Barcelona showed that a gulf existed between 1st and 2nd, and this season that gap is even wider.  

Blue moon rising

As for City there is a seeming inevitability about their rise to the top of English football, Rio’s comments appear to sense the impending domination. Ferguson knows how important the title will be for this club, with all the riches City have thrown at achieiving success it is not guaranteed. Ferguson has built a club on strong values and a trust in youth, he should be commended for all his achieved. Yet an impending sense of change appears upon us. City should have won the league this year with ease, however they have allowed United into the race, if they don't win this year then it will be only a matter of time.

City are certainly built and funded for a long term dominance and as the sun begins to set on Ferguson’s career, it seems fitting that perhaps the sun begins to set on the dominance of United in the league, there distinctly average performances this season with more than just a few mediocre players has led many to think if this is the worst United side in the past fifteen years. Has Ferguson assembled a side built to compete with the quality of players and excesses of money of their “noisy neighbours”? 


When you consider the quality of City compared to United it is hard to think who would get into that City side. I believe that only Rooney, Valencia and possibly Carrick are good enough, what does this say about the quality of United? 

The need to invest

It will be interesting to see how much investment and support will come from the board in the next few years. There has been many dissenting voices about their ownership yet with success comes silence. What will be interesting is when City start dominating the league, what will fans say then? I am sure more voices will be heard and the anti-Glazer campaign will pick up more steam. They have supported the manager in recent years, yet in order to compete with City it will need more. Do they have the funds or importantly the interest to bridge the gap? What is for certain is that it will be very interesting to see what happens in the coming years.  

I believe that since winning the Champions League in 2008 this side has become gradually poorer, Ferguson is to be blamed for this. The Barcelona which beat United in 2009 is better now than it was then, they have evolved their side to continually improve and develop in order to keep on top, Ferguson didn’t do this, instead he has continued with the same core of players for too long, and the evidence of this has been seen this year. Serious investment is needed to compete with City and continue United's dynasty. This will be testing times for Ferguson, the board and the fans. 


The Whitehouse Address is on Twitter @The_W_Address
 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Arsene Wenger holds the fate of England on his shoulders, we should be worried


There is a belief that Arsene Wenger develops and nurtures talent better than anyone else. Ask some Arsenal fans if this is true and many would agree, however ask them if this policy has achieved success and they will find it hard to argue that it has not. There is a belief that before Wenger came to these shores, young players weren’t being developed, methods on training and nutrition were non-existent and foreign players did not grace our English game. All these are fallacies perpetuated by the pro-Wenger media who have built up this manager as a prophet instead of a good manager.

Wenger was very successful in his opening years at Arsenal, he won the league and FA Cup and looked to be the man to knock Ferguson off his spot. Why was Wenger so good then, his methods apparently helped and Adams testifies to Wenger prolonging his career. However, what was key was what we inherited; a back four and GK drilled to perfection in the art of defending. Understanding, trust and bravery are key aspects of being a defender in the English league and Arsenal possessed that. Wenger bought very well also in his early years, with his understanding of the youth in France he managed to pick up players who had lost their way in Italy in Henry and Vieria and and was very fortunate that Bruce Ricoh had purchased a real master in Bergkamp. Wenger had the pieces to his puzzle in place and he was successful.

When he began losing these pieces his philosophy changed along with it, perhaps his vision was in line with Barcelona today, however he lacked the understanding of what makes Barcelona so good. He invested all into youth, completely disregarding the over 30’s of who had experience, knowledge and pedigree in winning, competing and fighting. The English league is a tough place, where physicality is a major component, it resembles our culture of hard work and grit. Spain resembles it’s culture as Brasil does. We cannot create this culture, it is ingrained. Ferguson knows this, and thus will continue with his older players as they know what it is like, they can be trusted, they can help the young players. When Hansen said “you won’ win anything with youth” he was right. You can’t win solely with youth, Ferguson didn’t, he had a mix. And this is the key.

Wenger has continued on his path of youth only development for the past 6 years. Not rarely buying a player over 25 and mostly under 21. His team has always been touted as young and we have been led to believe that give them time and they will be great. This has proved false. Wenger has failed in philosophy because he has forgotten the vital ingredient, experience. Without it, who will a player learn from? When things are tough, where is the experience to help weather the storm? Barcelona have mixed youth with experience and have been successful. Fabregas is an excellent example; captain of Arsenal at 24, arguably one of the most experienced players in the team. Yet he stagnated, he became burdened, no one was able to help him. He now looks the player we all thought he was going to be, why? Because he is surrounded by quality and experience, he can learn from Xavi, Iniesta and Guardiola and link up with Messi; world class needs world class.

And this brings me to my belief that Wenger holds England’s success in his hands. Alex Oxlade Chamberlain has shown glimpses of being something very special so far. He is young and yet possesses a great intelligence and understanding accompanied by technical brilliance and speed. He appears to have it all, yet does he have a manager and a team who can help progress further? Messi did, Ronaldo and Rooney did. Yet I look at Arsenal and I worry, Walcott has not become the player we thought, is this because of Wenger, I believe so. Aaron Ramsay rejected United and went to Arsenal, I believe he made an error. He could have learnt from Scholes and Giggs and being part of a winning team, learning about success. Arsenal offered 1st team football but they couldn’t offer him education, because this requires experience. So Arsenal now have Wilshere and Chamberlain, players who could be key to England being successful and yet are they in the right hands? Can we really trust Wenger to nurture our talent? I am not convinced.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Ferguson’s replacement, can anyone replace the legend?

In the ever changing world of football, where the length of a career is never defined and the line between success and failure can be so fine, there are not many who have transcended the decades and ever changing face of a sport like football like Alex Ferguson. He must be regarded as when of the best ever as he has created a dynasty, one which has never showed signs of falter, only perhaps transition. Whenever people question Sir Alex, he answers those doubters with titles and cups. He has an understanding of the changes of football and of what is required for the present and the future. The biggest question now that he must answer is who is the man required to carry on his legacy.



Many names have been touted in the last several years, men who have accomplished major things in world football, yet as Chelsea have found out, it is not so easy to get the right men, even if he is the best man. The job at Old Trafford is arguably one of the biggest roles in football and it requires a man of determination and resilience, with the ability to deal under the biggest pressures. There appears to be a belief that the “special one” is the ideal man for the job, the only one who has the ego and ability to deal with this high pressure job. I disagree.

Jose Mourinho is a journey man coach, one who goes from team to team and even though successful, is not in it for the long term. He is very successful at making his players believe in his system, he makes them winners. But, he does this with a team, not the club. He makes a group of players winners, but he does not plan for the future. He is consumed by a selfish desire to be the best manager, yet not to create a legacy, a dynasty. How long would Mourinho last at Old Trafford? 2, 3 years? No more. He has destroyed the greatness of Real Madrid in 2 years, they have become the antithesis to the beauty of Barcelona. Defensive style football versus attacking football may win games, yet Madrid or Man Utd are not defensive teams, they are attacking teams, there to entertain.

What is required of a top coach in world football today; they are psychologists, motivationists, tacticians, teachers. Who has these abilities and pedigree to justify working with a team of United’s statue? Martin O’Neill has been mentioned, yet he is a man who has no experience of coaching a top team, sorry, but Celtic don’t count on the grand scale of world football. He is an average coach who gets more from his players with motivation than tactics, however at the top level, motivation is not enough. Capello has shown to be capable of winning things yet he is too defensive for the English league and for a team like United. In my opinion there is only one man capable of taking over from Alex Ferguson, a man who has a history of winning titles and cups, a man who has teams playing winning, attacking football. The only man capable is Josep Guardiola.
Guardiola has shown in the past 4 years that he has all the attributes of coaching a successful team and managing players to put the team first, something Ferguson has always done so well. His brand of attacking football is regarded as the best there has ever been, he understands what is required and is able to get his message across. His name is synonymous with success, quality and class and he will have the draw of players all over the world willing to play for him. His multi lingual ability will enable him to communicate with the globalised world of players that are now a part of the English league.

It can be argued that Guardiola may actually be needed at United, where the 4-4-2 is still commonly used even though the modern game requires players through the units, the 4-3-3 showing how effective it can be in defence as well as attack. His impressive tactical brain and ability to alter aspects through the game appears to come from his time in Italy. It can be argued that Guardiola blends the styles and tactics and Spain and Italy and with his high tempo attacking play he has the potential to light the English league up where pressing and attacking is the bench mark of the league.

Above all, what makes Guardiola the perfect man to take over at the theatre of dreams is his trust and desire to develop youth through the Academy. One of Ferguson’s most important legacies is the players that he brings through, you cannot say that about Mourinho and I struggle to believe that Ferguson, who will undoubtedly have the option of who to take on, will choose a man who neglects products of the Academy so readily. Guardiola has brought through 25 players from the La Masia Academy in his time with Barca, he is an avid believer in that youth players, developed with the love of the club with the team’s philosophy ingrained into them, will be more valuable to the team.

After being beaten twice by Guardiola I am in no doubt that Ferguson looked across to his foe and believed that he was looking at a man who stood for everything he did; passion, dedication, high principles and a love for attacking football. With the life span of Spanish coaches being no more than 3 years, Pep knows he is coming to the end of a most glittering career at the Camp Nou. He has spoken of wanting to coach in England yet wants to take a sabbatical to spend more time with his family. It is not hard to believe that when Ferguson ends his time in the summer of 2013, Pep will be waiting in the wings to be unveiled, Alex’s last gift to the club, safe in the knowledge that Pep will continue his tradition of style and winning.

Follow The Whitehouse Address at @The_W_Address

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Ferguson: “ Barça are the best team in the world”

The press conference held before tonight's ceremony was shared between the three Barça representatives(Guardiola, Xavi and Messi) and Manchester United boss Sir Alex Ferguson. The Scot was again full of praise for Barça, claiming: "as a team they are the best by a long way and I've been saying that for a few years now. Sometimes in football you just have to say 'they are better than us.' Barça are the best and I can see nobody better to win the award tonight than Pep." As to Leo Messi, Sir Alex believes: "he's a player who could have been playing in the 50s, just as well as now." (via FCBarcelona.cat)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Ferguson prefers Guardiola for Manchester United before to Mourinho

Rendered FC Barcelona football, Sir Alex Ferguson would welcome that Pep Guardiola as his successor on the bench for Manchester United.


According to British newspaper 'Daily Express', near the Scottish people have already Pep Guardiola probed to determine to what extent he would be willing to replace Ferguson in the direction of the 'Red Devils'.

According to British media have, Ferguson does not forget the success of Real Madrid coach, Jose Mourinho, to Chelsea preferred London but he prefers Pep Guardiola like his future successor.

The preparer's link with Barca Guardiola, who signs the contract from year to year, and the game displayed by Barça put the Catalan shot in front of Manchester United for a not too distant future. (via SPORT)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...