Showing posts with label Man City. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Man City. Show all posts

United's Decline. How United Have Regressed Tactically Since Quieroz


In 2002 Alex Ferguson made a bold and visionary decision to bring in Carlos Quieroz as his assistant and also as his successor at Old Trafford. It was a masterstroke in terms of modernising Man United in order to do more in Europe and to take them into the 21st century. Yet ten years later and United are back to their pre-Quieroz, British style, which is not good news for United fans.



Man United almost ended the season as English Champions; a matter of minutes separated them from glory and then in a fleeting moment, the title was gone. Losing the title however was possibly the best thing to happen to United, as it may have allowed Ferguson to stress to the board that this team needs strengthening. With the arrival of Kagawa it appears that United are certainly looking to improve, yet this is just one of many United fans should be hoping arrive this summer. 


The issue of United’s inability to compete with Chelsea, Madrid, Barca and importantly Man City means that Ferguson needs to be shrewder in the market; Kagawa is a good acquisition, mainly because he gives United something they lack, creativity and guile. Investment is important and smart investment is even more key, United need to do something to stay with the big spenders. Yet the reason why United are falling further away from their elite rivals has to do with their tactics as much as the quality of their players.


Enter a vision

In 2002 Carlos Quieroz arrived at Old Trafford to replace Steve McLaren, he had previously been coaching the national sides of UAE and South Africa and Ferguson sought to bring in a coach who could replicate and further the work of McLaren. He did an excellent job in his first year and United brought the title back to Old Trafford, snatching it from Arsenal in the 02/03 season. 


In that following summer, United would embark on a new approach to how they played the game, out went the poster boy Beckham and in came Cristiano Ronaldo. There was talk before Ronaldo arrived that Ronaldinho and Arjen Robben were been sought to come to Old Trafford, for whatever reason this didn't happen, yet what these targets indicated was that the classic United style of play was about to change; favouring dribblers over crossers. 


That summer however Quieroz’s was sought by Real Madrid and he left United to go manage them 2003. Unfortunately for him though his time there was not a positive one and he returned as United’s assistant that following summer, just as Rooney was being signed from Everton. Reforming the old partnership with Alex Ferguson proved an attractive option to both sides; United had trailed 15 points behind Arsenal, and Ferguson was forced to bring in temporary help from Walter Smith during the tough end of season run-in. Subsequently, Queiroz returned to United as assistant manager in July 2004, signing a three year deal.

Ronaldo's first season at Old Trafford was a difficult one; a boy who appeared to be very skilful yet too selfish with the ball, seemingly happier to beat a player than create goal scoring chances and after the productive quality of Beckham led many to question the logic of United’s acquisition and their vision for the future. With the return of Quieroz however Ronaldo had a man who could teach and educate him to further his game and develop him into one of the world's best. Although that following season no trophies were won, United were developing a new style, and Ferguson appeared willing to be patient in order build and develop their excellent youth players in Ronaldo and Rooney. 


Some important factors affected the coming seasons; it can be argued that United’s success was down to the arrivals of Van Der Sar, Vidic and Evra, who brought stability to what was at times a leaky defence. And in November 2005 United made their most decisive decision, they released Roy Keane from the club. It was Queiroz who was heavily rumoured to be one of the main reasons for team captain Roy Keane's departure from Manchester United. According to Keane, he did not like the tactics that Quieroz employed and he also did not like the way he was given so much responsibility as if he were manager of the club. This was a clear indication that the old school United mentality was being phased out; Beckham, Phil Neville, Nicky Butt and now Keane were all moved on, it was an indication that Ferguson was willing to trust the vision of Quieroz and create a side capable of not just dominating England, but Europe.


A transformation from British to European

One of the major criticisms of Ferguson has been his failings in Europe, four finals reached in his lengthy career at United does seem a too few compared to the dominance that United have had in England. It was clear that the coaching of Kidd and McLaren, although successful, meant that United lacked the edge and understanding of the European game. This is why I believe Quieroz was brought in; to make United dominant in Europe by modernizing their style.

Quieroz transformation of the side was complete in the summer of 2006 when Ruud Van Nistelrooy was moved on, citing issues between him and Ronaldo, whose late delivery meant Ruud was not receiving the right service. Ferguson chose Ronaldo and that following season United not only won the league, but did it in style. Ronaldo scored 23 goals in all competitions, almost as many as he had done in the previous three seasons. 


What was clear was that Ronaldo was now the goal scorer, yet his position was from the right wing. This evolution of style was away from United’s wide play tactic of crossing and finishing. Ronaldo was now instructed to stay wide and drive inside, with the single mentality of scoring goals. Quieroz clearly saw the way football was developing and the use of inverted wingers, those who cut inside not out, and who seek to score not provide, was what Ronaldo was groomed to be. We see this commonly now with Robben, Di Maria and Messi and it appears Quieroz saw the future of football and where the game was heading.


The frustration which Ronaldo had served the fans previously was now rewarded with goals and success. He picked up the PFA players player of the year award, the young player of the year award and fans player of the year award. Ronaldo was also one of eight United players named in the 06/07 Team of the season (where the back four and GK were picked). It was clear that Quieroz had succeeded in transforming this side from a rigid, 4-4-2 force into one which was now fluid and flexible. He had been given time to evolve the side to become more dynamic and altered the style to reflect the more open and progressive play of the Dutch and Barcelona.

In 2007/08 Ronaldo won the European Golden Shoe, the first winger to receive this award. It just showed how far United had come in terms of their progressive style, their winger was now their forward and the side was created to get the best from Ronaldo. Often the ball would be played down the left, it would then be switched long to Ronaldo who would be hugging the right touchline, his immaculate touch and then speed and skill would frighten the full backs and his ability to drive and shoot at speed with power and precision meant he was the most frightening player in the world. Pure perfection and all credit to Quieroz in making this possible.

United won the title three times in a row from 2006-2009 and it was apparent that Ferguson’s own vision to evolve the side and create a truly modern European side was vindicated. Quieroz was the architect, he solidified the defence and created an attacking foursome which was fluid, creative and ruthless. 


The creator leaves & old ways return

In 2008 amid rumors of an opening as the Portuguese National Coach, Alex Ferguson started to push for Queiroz to be his successor as manager at Old Trafford and discouraged any possible suitors from approaching him. However, rumours over the summer of 2008 continued to link Queiroz with the Portugal national football team managers' role, following the departure of Luiz Felipe Scolari and in July 2008, Manchester United agreed to release Queiroz from his contract and he was appointed manager for the Portuguese national team. 


This was a major loss for United and Ferguson, he clearly was grooming him as his replacement, he had handed over much responsibility and he had allowed Quieroz to evolve the style of the side. Ferguson should have done more to keep Quieroz, perhaps even stepping aside to allow him to manage the club, instead he left the current Champions Leagues winners, and his departure would mean a gradual decline in style, quality and success. 

United were unable to keep Quieroz for the 08/09 season yet they did keep Ronaldo, and they almost won the Champions League again, losing to Barcelona in the final in Rome. Yet losing Ronaldo and Tevez that following summer meant the team which Quieroz had perfected were no longer. The new assistant Mike Phelan, who replaced Quieroz, is the reason I believe that United increased their gap between the top sides and theirselves. In the Champions League final in Rome Barcelona showed the world that they were in fact the rising side of Europe and that their style was the one which served a method for success. If Quieroz had been there would it have been different? Would they have been tactically better than they were that night? I believe so.


For me this Barcelona style could have been United, they were progressing to this way of playing, yet the departure of Quieroz was a damaging blow which I don’t believe many comprehend. When Portugal came calling Ferguson should have stepped down to allow him to take over and continue his great work. Losing Ronaldo was inevitable, yet Barcelona lost Ronaldinho remember,  yet it was who replaced these men that mattered. Antonio Valencia and Michael Owen showed a regression back to the old ways; Phelan clearly has an old coaching mentality and this shows in how United began to play. He replaced Ronaldo, an inside forward with Valencia, a classic winger. I rate Valencia highly, yet he was step backwards in terms of the modern game. 


I also believe that the arrivals of Nani and Anderson would have been more beneficial if Quieroz was there to nurture them, he clearly did that with Ronaldo and Rooney and his absence and ultimate influence has been lost on these players. Anderson particularly has had his creativity and guile coached out of him to become a continuity midfielder. This is sacrilege to what was one of the most promising attacking midfielders of his generation. And Nani possesses the skill yet lacks the focus which Ronaldo was given under the guidance of Quieroz. 


A widening gap of styles

Although success domestically has come under Phelan, United have not closed the gap on sides like Barcelona, but got further away. Now we see the emergence of Madrid, Bayern and now Man City. The quality of these sides is high yet the key factor is their style reflects the modern game; a modern 4-2-3-1 with four interchanging forwards creates problems for even the best defences. The key to this formation is the use of two holding players to prevent counter attacks, break up play and supply forwards. 


Yet as we see progressive tactics abroad, we see United have reverted back to a 4-4-1-1 which offers little creativity or variety. A formation which against the poor sides of the Premier League will work, yet as has been seen against sides like Bayern in 2010 and Barcelona in 2011, is ineffective against the top sides. Even sides like Newcastle and Wigan have outplayed United this season and this is because their style has become too predictable. 


This season has seen the worse United for over a decade, although their points tally was high, teams like Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea were distinctly poor and their only genuine rivals in City took 6 points from them. At the start of the 2011 season United were appearing to want to play open attacking football, yet the key to this tactic is having a stable defence behind it, in the 3-1 win over Chelsea it could easily have been a defeat and the final straw was the mauling against City at home. Whereas Quieroz had sorted the defence and made it organised, the new team of Phelan and Meulensteen had seemed to allow complete openness to come through the whole side. If you wish to play with four attacking players, then you must have a strong midfield and defensive stability, the 6-1 loss showed the lack of defensive organisation which was United's strength under Quieroz. 


Gary Neville has spoken of the methodical methods of Quieroz in training, it was modern football; fluid in attack, yet knowing your position and role. Just what Guardiola has done at Barcelona. Top level coaching is not just about choosing a side and playing, it is intricate and detailed, it is why Mourinho and Guardiola are the best right now, they focus on the detail. United clearly have lost their focus. Although they almost won the title still, performances in Europe indicated that this style will not lead to success and I anticipate City and Chelsea being much better next season.

Can they re-modernise?

The arrival of Kagawa shows an intent of a willingness to play a more creative and fluid attacking system, Antonio Valencia has shown he is capable of driving inside aswell as out and United will need to play more in this style if they wish to go further in Europe. Mike Phelan and Rene Meulensteen are answerable for what happens at United now, I have my doubts about Phelan’s capabilities in such an illustrious role and really question Ferguson’s decision to regress the style of play, it seemed just as United were about to peak they reverted back to the old way. It is not easy to choose an assistant, you need to trust them implicitly, yet it is important to choose a man with vision and an understanding of the modern game. Real success comes in Europe now, and United appear a long way off from getting close to a European crown at this time. For me, if they continue with a 4-4-1-1 philosophy then expect to go out early in Europe and to struggle in the league. 


People talk of the United way, yet right now that way is not right, much needs to be done this summer, it doesn’t need massive investment but it does need vision; in Kagawa I see a player similar to Silva, yet United more like that, more creativity, more guile, more fluidity. Yet they also need a defensive midfielder who is strong and disciplined, it is a position which has not been filled since Fletcher became injured and which is key for United in order to give Carrick the freedom to start attacks and the lack of a true defensive midfielder has allowed the good players to find space against United and punish them, surely lessons have been learnt?

In 2003 Ronaldo was purchased, a vision was laid down and with patience and guidance United became the best side in the world. I don’t see that vision today, young players have been brought in yet I don’t see the creativity of an Ozil, or the skill of a Messi in that side. What I see is continuity players, effective to a level, yet I thought United were more than that. I see a side holding on to their crown of England’s best, yet around them I see sides and coaches evolving and adapting to the modern game. Until United address this issue they will not be on top of Europe again and this must be a pressing concern for the fans. 





The Whitehouse Address is very passionate about the future of football and all that concerns. Whether from the grassroots to the senior game, there are issues, especially in England, which are not being addressed and because of this England is being left behind by the rest. If you have an opinion on what is said here then find me on Twitter and I will happily discuss @The_W_Address




  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

The 20th Premier League Season. An Analysis

In what has been billed one of the best seasons ever, it is important to reflect that it has been perhaps one of the most entertaining because it has been one of the worst in terms of quality. Defending at times appeared to go out the window, yet it gave us scorelines from years gone by. Many questions were asked of owners and managers, many transfers questioned and new stars were made. 


The last day of the season was by far the best finish in Premier League history and for that this 20th season will be remembered fondly. A fifth name on the trophy has been marked and it may be the dawn of a new era in the Premier League. This is my analysis of all the sides this season, what they did, or not and what the future holds for them for next year.






1st, Manchester City

In what was one of the most dramatic endings to a Premier League season for a long time,  Man City have put their names on the trophy as only the fifth side in Premier League history to do so. Considering that the title was won in the last minute of the season, it seems odd to say that it was City’s to lose throughout the campaign. Yet they almost did it, and not just yesterday, but in their away from with losses against Sunderland, Everton, Swansea and Arsenal all but seemingly throwing away the league. When 8 points behind  United it seemed over, and although there was talk of the “project” not factoring in a title win so soon, it would have been seen as a capitulation and a sign of the mental block that City had been associated with. 


As it was, 6 wins to finish the season did the trick, importantly the defeat to United at home. With the money spent it would seem obvious that the title was “won”, however this side has come from nowhere to get in the position it is now. With a very limited history, investment was the only way City would be able to compete. With the acquisition of Aguero this season, City have arguably the best keeper, defender (Kompany), midfielder (Yaya) and forward (Aguero) in the league. What this title win did, and importantly the manner of it, was show City that in those moments when all seems lost, can pull something out like that. If they had won 6-0, the win would not have given them as much belief as what happened Sunday. This is not good for those around them, the hardest one is the first and the coming decade may see a genuine force ignite on world football. 


As for Mancini, by his own actions he knew his job depended on that result and the title, at 2-1 it all seemed over, yet he has given himself another season, I say this because his record in the Champions League is scratchy at best and with City’s ambitions, the next step is that tournament. With a relatively poor and naive showing in Europe this year, it is vital that the title was won. Expect players to leave this year, notably Tevez & Balotelli whose suitors could include Champions League qualifiers PSG and Malaga. It may be that Falcao is looked at to come in up top, along with a world class defensive midfielder of the ilk of Gokhan Inler or Arturo Vidal. A key acquisition will be a central defender, losing Jerome Boateng was not as costly as it could have been as City were lucky with injuries compared to their rivals. Yet clearly without Kompany, this side looked vulnerable. Expect one or two new players in defence in order to make it stronger. 


Exciting times ahead for City, for many fans there is anger regarding their investment, yet the truth is, if you want the best you spend the best. City are the only side in the league that can be regarded as world class. Their title win is much deserved due to their performances this season.

2nd  Manchester United


So close! As the final whistle went at the Stadium of Light it appeared that Ferguson had somehow pulled off another last gasp snatch of the title. A season where United seemed out of it, only to come back and be 8 points clear, appeared to say everything about this club and their manager. Quite simply, don’t write them off. However, in a very un-United fashion, 5 points dropped to Wigan and Everton in the run in effectively cost United the title. They should never have been waiting on City for their result, yet they should also have never been in that situation anyway. Comparing the two sides, the quality and the investment, would put City very much in front. The fact it came down to goal difference indicates that United did excellently considering the financial might of their neighbours. Before yesterday United had what City didn’t, the knowledge of getting over the line. For 30 minutes it appeared City had choked, and in all honesty they did. However, that goal in the 94th minute will be a sign to Ferguson that this team and their manager are made of tough stuff and that he has a genuine battle on his hands. 


The key now is, what will United do to compete? Since Ronaldo and Tevez left investment has been minimal and the quality of players brought in has been average for a team of United’s calibre. They are one of the greatest sides in the world, yet their squad does not reflect that. The absence of Vidic was a major blow and I wonder how well City would have done if Kompany had been out, I doubt we would be calling them Champions. Yet Ferguson has put his trust in the potential of youth; De Gea, Jones, Smalling, the Da Silva’s and Welbeck have been almost ever presents this season, yet questions still remain for all these players. I am sure they will improve and may be the new generation of United, yet Rooney was right, the quality of this side is not good enough. Rooney, Vidic, Carrick and Valencia are only top quality players in the side now, the team has aged and needs evolving. This summer is vital for United if they wish to stay close to City. The question is, will the Glazers give Ferguson the money and wages to bring in proven talent? Until this happens, I can only see the gap between United and City getting larger.

3rd Arsenal

If I was told this side would finish third after seven games I would have laughed very hard. However, the fact they have says more about the quality of the sides in the league than Arsenal themselves. The chaos of last summer came into the season, poor decisions, misplaced trust and a lack of any plan meant that Arsenal were quite a shambles. Whereas last season they were in for a chance to win the league, this season they have scraped third and finish 19 points behind the top. Each season they get further behind, it must be worrying for the fans. 


A key characteristic of Arsenal is their lack of mental strength and they almost threw away third these past weeks as much as they had done well to earn it. Credit must also go to the capitulation of their neighbours yet Wenger should be both pleased and distressed by this season. Player of the season Robin Van Persie has managed to keep fit and has shown the world he is one of the best forwards in football today. Yet, how likely he will stay at Arsenal is essential for their future. He may have enough love for London and his family to stay, yet for solely footballing reasons, he should go. Arsenal have an average side which needs major investment, the choice of Wenger and the board was to invest in the stadium and hope Wenger can perform miracles to keep Arsenal competitive. He did, and quite a remarkable achievement it has been. 


Yet, there is now a top 6/7 which will be all vying for a shot at top four. Wenger is very lucky to have finished in the top four and he has kept the wolves from the door again. Yet if Arsenal don’t improve the squad, in defence, full back, defensive mid and up front then don’t expect to see Arsenal in the top four next season. For me, if Arsenal do want to progress, it may mean Wenger leaving. Defensively they are a shambles still, 49 goals conceded is not title winning, perhaps Bould can improve on Rice’s performance, yet this is a side which is nowhere near winning anything.


4th Tottenham


The award for greatest capitulation goes to Spurs. Talk of title chasers seemed to have legs and the game at the Etihad could have been a chance for Spurs to get close to the top. However, how moments change seasons and no sooner was Defoe missing a chance on the line, Balotelli was slotting home a 92nd minute penalty and getting the three points. The following weeks changed their season when Capello left and Redknapp was the “clear” choice of his replacement. To say that affected the team is an understatement and although an impressive 5-0 win over Newcastle appeared to show Spurs were serious, the resulting six points from eighteen, including a monumental 5-2 loss to Arsenal, appeared to show that the rumours had taken it’s effect and a season which seemed title chasing, ended in a fourth place finish, which now rests on the final in Munich to see if Champions League football will take place next season. 


As much as the England job may have affected the team, Redknapp still has questions to answer over his incessant use of the same side for the majority of the season, where his large and strong squad is rarely rotated well enough for the rigours of the Premier League. His use of Bale in central areas affected the flow and effectiveness of the player and the team and perhaps his own desire to have Bale be more than a winger was proven wrong. The situation last summer regarding Modric was deemed by many to be a masterstroke by Levy in not accepting a £40 million bid from Chelsea, yet I am sure that money would have been welcomed by Redknapp who would have preferred to have brought in a replacement and a striker who actually wanted to be at White Hart Lane, over a player whose head had clearly being turned. I doubt they will get that offer this summer yet may accept that he wants to go this summer; with United and Chelsea sure to be enquiring. 


As for the future of this side, with only £5 million spent last summer Spurs have done very well, yet more is needed this summer to maintain their position. With Defoe talking of leaving and Adebayor unsure of his situation, a striker is a necessity. Could they tempt a Falcao or a Huntelaar or are these targets fantasy instead of reality? Is Loic Remy a good prospect? Ultimately a disappointing season, for most of it Spurs played good football and entertained, yet they fell away when it mattered, however if Bayern come through this weekend, then at least Spurs achieved what they intended to.


5th Newcastle


For many the team of the year. In my opinion there is another who deserve that accolade, yet Newcastle have been excellent this season. With the animosity that came from the fans when Pardew first arrived in the autumn of 2010, it seemed inconceivable that Newcastle could be challenging for Champions League football this season. However, they have done and although not achieving that Holy Grail, fifth place is a remarkable achievement. 


The reason people say team of the year is because for many the expected relegation for the Toon. What a ridiculous statement. This was based on the losses of Barton, Carroll and Nolan and the replacements of Cabaye and Ba. This is what makes me laugh about the English media, they assume that when you lose the “English desire” then you can’t compete. Yet what Newcastle did was bring in a midfielder who played an important role in winning Lille the French league the year before. Surely that’s a step up? Playing alongside Tiote, a title winner for Twente in Holland too would appear to show an improvement, not a regression. And the season has shown that this is correct. Ridding yourself of Barton was the best decision made by Ashley and Newcastle have been a unified team this season. 


Pardew deserves much credit for bringing this group together, for improving the performances of Coloccini, Perch and Ben Arfa in particular. Playing Jonas in a def mid position has been a great tactical decision and the scouting network of Newcastle must be commended for the purchases made in the past 18 months. Ashley received much derision from the Newcastle fans and though much of it justified, he has brought them around as the club has improved on the pitch and off it. I cannot see Newcastle suffering a drop next season, although Graham Carr needs to be busy this summer as many players at Newcastle will be on many top sides radar this summer.


6th Chelsea


Along with Liverpool perhaps the most fascinating of clubs solely based on their disastrous season. Amazingly Chelsea are FA Cup winners and have the chance to win the Champions League this weekend. Quite remarkable considering the turmoil which has surrounded the club. Ancelotti was sacked at the end of last season as he didn’t win a trophy, even though the year before he had won the double. Abramovich’s desire for world domination often forgets to account for periods of transition and stability. It was decided that a young, successful and ambitious man was needed for the role of taking Chelsea from the 00’s to the 10’s and the role was given to the heir apparent to Mourinho, Andre Villa-Boas. A staggering £13 million was spent to pry him away from Porto and many believed that Chelsea were destined for much success. 


However, all was not as bright as it seemed for the “Group one” who did all he could to cut a divide between the players and himself. His handling of certain players and his mishandling of the press, meant that he was given a tough time, which if results are going well, can be excused. Yet the “Barcelona” way was not working for Chelsea and Villas-Boas was cut an isolated figure, looking deft of ideas and friends. His talk of the long term project forgot about the need for short term success and as the league became unattainable and the Champions League campaign almost over, he was deemed surplus. 


Amazingly, yet not surprisingly, the team started to win, confidence was reborn and Chelsea appeared their old self. Ironically the team was galvanised by the “Old Guard” of Terry, Lampard and Drogba yet notable mentions of the season goes to Ramires and Mata. Di Matteo has done a astounding job in his time as caretaker, the question remains whether he is the right man for the future of the club, yet he has clearly grown into his role as manager and with any job, success instils confidence. Can Chelsea overcome Bayern this weekend and put Di Matteo in the history books? Who knows. Yet if Chelsea do wish to challenge for the title again then Roman needs to understand that money is not everything, stability is as important. Does the side need evolving, yes, yet is the new philosophy of players like De Bruyne and Marin going to be able to emulate the power and strength of the last decade? Drogba may well leave this summer, can Lukaku be his replacement? What is important is that investment is made in the centre of the pitch, where Chelsea used to be so strong, they have lost the force they had. I believe Di Matteo would be ne

7th Everton


David Moyes spoke of a man who was disappointed with his achievements this season, 7th place in front of Liverpool had many Evertonians jumping for joy. Yet what they have in this man is a winner, who unfortunately has not won anything in his decade at the club. That being said, he has exceeded expectations relative to the money spent season on season. The outlay of money from Everton is that of a side in the lower regions of the league, so to finish consistently in these places is remarkable. Yet the fans protests are not wrong, if Everton want to keep their manager and want to push on further, then serious investment is needed. 


Kenwright has received much derision from the fans this season as in their belief, he is holding the club back. He says he is waiting for the right buyer and when looking at Blackburn, Portsmouth and even Villa, foreign ownership can be dangerous. However, Everton need to address their early season form in order to push on further, too many slow starts contribute to a game of catch up which is not conducive to a successful campaign. The key acquisitions of Jelavic and Peinnar were vital in the second half of the season, both players being key to this 7th place finish. 


As for next season, much was said of young Ross Barkley who has not the influence that Rooney did, yet expect more next season. As for Rodwell, if a bid of £10m+ comes in then Everton should accept it, that money could be used on bringing back Peinnar and investing in the team. They are a good, stable side, and with a full season of Jelavic expect more goals, yet the fans are right, in order to progress more investment is needed. 


8th Liverpool

This has to be the worst performance of any team in the league. With all the hype, the heavy investment and what was actually a decent end to last season, it appeared that Liverpool were about to challenge the big boys again. Oh, how wrong those people were. The signings made last summer were simply wrong, for quality and especially cost. Dalglish and Comolli got it all wrong and one has paid for his job already. 


Performances on the pitch have at times being good, yet it is a results game and the results at Liverpool have just not being good enough. Six wins at home all season, fourteen in total, is not showing signs of improvement. The woodwork has been blamed yet what the problem is that the players have not been good enough. The ever changing formations and styles in order to bring about results have produced just confusion and fourteen losses is a long way from Rafa’s two when Liverpool finished second. That season there was Torres, Alonso and Mascherano and a fit Gerrard. The team now is simply not good enough, Gerrard is past his best and his influence on the side should be reduced. Of the one class player in the side in Suarez he has not been used to his best and the way the club handled the Evra affair was utterly shambolic and Ian Cotton has paid the price for the club handled this situation. 


It would appear that John Henry is wielding the axe on those deemed responsible for a dreadful season. The main culprit must be Dalglish. He is in charge of ultimately who comes in to the club and is key in what happens on the pitch. His attitude, media handling and clear stress has had a negative impact on the club. He has not brought out the best in any of his players and if Liverpool do wish to progress further and have them challenging for more than the League Cup, then he must go. With a new kit sponsor and more investment to come, Henry needs to bring a man in who can take the club forward and who he can trust to invest his money to make Liverpool better. Don't be surprised to see someone like Maritnez. whose style and impressive performances of late seem to have earned him a chance at a club in the upper echelons of the league. For John Henry though, another year of this cannot be accepted. 

9th Fulham


With the departure of Mark Hughes last summer citing lack of ambition and investment for his reason for leaving, Fulham appeared in a difficult position. The performance of Hodgson had made Fulham into a mid table side and yet Hughes felt he could not take them further. A new man was required, and Al Fayed decided that the old Spurs boss Martin Jol was the answer. It appeared a difficult period at the start for Fulham, 12 points in 13 games  had Fulham 15th and a relegation battle seemed a likely outcome. Exit in the Europa League, of which such drama and joy had come previously was not received well either. Added to this ongoing issues with Zamora and Jol was not looking like the best choice. 


However, since the turn of the year Fulham have picked up 32 points and have impressed with their style, the 5-2 defeat of Newcastle was a notably impressive performance. The key to the season has been the performances and goals of Clint Dempsey; 17 goals in the league has been his best return and he clearly enjoys the free role behind the striker that Jol has afforded him. The problem for Fulham will be keeping hold of a player who at 29, would be looking to finish his career with Champions League football. Arsenal would be a great destination for the American and I am sure Fulham will not be able to keep hold of him for next year. This is also the case with Moussa Dembele, whose performances this season have seen him linked to United. Just as Martin Jol has brought the club and players round to his way, it may be that he needs to rebuild this summer, will Al Fayed give him the cash in order to maintain this position?

10th WBA


When Di Matteo was sacked as manager of West Brom it seemed slightly harsh, although on a bad run, fans argued he deserved his chance to keep Albion in the league. However, in retrospect, the decision worked out for both. Di Matteo is about to manage Chelsea in a Champions League final, and West Brom have finished above Villa for the first time in 33 years. Bringing in Roy Hodgson was a excellent choice as his time at Fulham shown, he is very good at working with average players as he gets them organised and solid. It worked at keeping Albion up and his signing of Shane Long showed ambition from the club. His decision to go to England is understandable, yet one wonders where West Brom will go from here. A side which seemed a serial yo yo club has now the look of a stable Premier League team, yet the next managerial appointment will be vital. Talk of Ranieri seems fantasy, yet Houghton seems possible. Don’t write off the return of Michael Appleton, a very well respected coach at Albion who has learnt his managerial trade at Portsmouth, if he can manage that circus, he can do anything surely? 

11th Swansea


My team of the season unquestionably. When Swansea won the play off final last season the verdict straight away was, doomed for relegation! Understandable based on the finances and history of the club. And also because their brand of football, which delighted fans in the Championship, was surely only going to cause problems in the Premier League? A 4-0 loss to City on the first game of the season appeared to show that the media was right, a lot of nice passing, yet in this league, they would be punished. However, Swansea have been a revelation this season, winning 12 games and accumulating 47 points has been remarkable for a club which trains at a local leisure centre. 


The key to the season has been their manager, who is a believer in the Spanish style of playing football and whose desire and ability to instil belief into his players has been a major factor in Swansea’ excellent season. Added to that the signings of Danny Graham from Watford, whose 10 goals has been an excellent return on his £3.5 million move last summer and perhaps most importantly was the acquisition of Michel Vorm, who was purchased for only £1.5 million from Utrecht and who has been magnificent for the Swans this campaign. A goal keeper and a goal scorer are vital components for any side, and in Graham and Vorm Swansea have found players who have aided their survivial push. 


The style will not change at Swansea and perhaps towards the end of the season there have been games where Swansea have been found out as such, next season may prove to be trickier as sides adapt well to a new side in the second year. It may also be difficult to keep hold of some of the players and especially their manager, whose stock has risen steeply this season, do not be surprised to see changes occurring this summer at Swansea and relegation may be a possibility next year, yet for this year at least, all credit must go the whole club for their remarkable achievements.


12th Norwich


On Saturday 8th August 2009 Norwich had just lost 7-1 to Colchester at home in league 1. If you had told a fan then that Norwich would be in the Premier League in two seasons time you would probably made them laugh all day long. Yet, it goes to show that with the right man in charge, anything is possible. In Paul Lambert Norwich have uncovered a gem of a manager, his drive and desire are often hidden in interviews, yet his players and the results clearly indicate that this man has a special touch of bringing out the best in his players, a trait of all the best managers. 


With perhaps a more pragmatic style than Swansea Norwich have been excellent this campaign; led by the surprisingly excellent Grant Holt, who has rightly deserved calls for a England call up, and the impressive performances of Hoolahan and Howson in midfield, this side has proved the doubters wrong and shown that previous league experience is not the most important aspect to survival. Determination, loyalty and desire have contributed to Norwich’s superb campaign. The key now will be what happens when Lambert leaves, with suitors such as Villa keenly interested and talk even of Liverpool, it will be near impossible to keep this man for next season. Can Norwich maintain their form in his absence? It will be interesting and perhaps very difficult; Lee Clark would be a good bet to replace Lambert with his previous work at the club before leaving for Huddersfield. A great season for the fans, unclear times ahead.


13th Sunderland


It is safe to say that if Sunderland had not acted and removed Steve Bruce last November, then 13th would not be their final position. Since the end of last season Sunderland were in free fall, losing Bent and Gyan were massive in the downfall of Sunderland yet Bruce had to take much blame and although the signs were clear to see, Bruce was allowed to continue. It did not last long though and his immediate successor was brought in and immediately changed the clubs fortunes. O’Neill is good at that, he goes back the basics, makes things simple and builds up the confidence of his players. It showed in the results, in his first 10 games Sunderland gained 22 points. 


However, in the 14 games to finish the season they have only won twice and the worry for Sunderland and their fans must be that the honeymoon period is certainly over. O’Neill will demand heavy investment such as at Villa, and although relative success may occur, it may prove more damaging for Sunderland in the long term as O’Neill pays high wages to distinctly average players. It may also be difficult to keep a player of Sessegnon’s quality who has lit up the Stadium of Light at times this season. Perhaps a lot of money may be spent this summer, yet Sunderland fans should be slightly apprehensiveness about what the future holds. The key though has been that Sunderland have maintained their Premier League status, which under Bruce looked precarious at best. 



14th Stoke City

The fact that people believe Stoke finishing 14th is disappointing tells you of the impressive job that Tony Pulis has done at Stoke City. A team which is now considered an established Premier League side has perhaps not surpassed last season’s 13th place finish and FA Cup final, yet it has given the fans Europa League football and has seen sides like Valencia come to the Britannia. Pulis believes it is his sides best season and their form after games in Europe has been the reason for their lower position. With the purchases of Crouch and Palacios the intent of the manager and the board is clear; they want to keep improving and adding more quality to the side. With owner Peter Coates, chairman of Bet365 funding the side, then promising signs are ahead. With Pulis in charge, his pragmatic ways have galvanised the city of Stoke and the fans are some of the most vocal and passionate in the country. In three years Stoke have established themselves remarkably well, this summer will be interesting however, as the side clearly needs to improve, as players like Upson and Woodgate have shown their age and deficiencies throughout. Carlos Cuellar is available, and may fit the bill of tall, imposing defender which Pulis loves. Yet more guile and creative influence in midfield may be needed to push Stoke on.

15th Wigan

The story of the last 10 games has been Wigan. Written off by every pundit and fan before Christmas, and justifiably when on an eight game losing streak, somehow Martinez has pulled them out of the relegation zone once again. And this time in much more impressive fashion. Wins against Liverpool, United, Arsenal and Newcastle have been quite remarkable, and the fashion in which they have done it is the more impressive. Having a philosophy of playing football is admirable, whereas Stoke are direct, Wigan like to pass it the Spanish way. At the end of the day, what is the most important is results. And earlier on this season, this style was just not working. However, in some Quixotic way Martinez has stuck with his style and has overcome the odds and proved doubters wrong. Losing players like N’zogbia, Valencia, Palacios and Cattermole has apparently been the “reason” Wigan struggle so much in the early part of the season. This is slightly untrue, yet it shows that this current team is completely Martinez’s and that with these impressive performances, players like Moses and Maloney will be interesting other clubs around. Do not be surprised also if Ali Al Habsi departs to a bigger side, as he has really shown his class this season. 


All this being said, if Wigan do lose more players, then Martinez may decide that he has done all he can at this club. And I am sure there will be suitors in England and Spain who would have been mightily impressed by how Wigan played against the “top” sides. Expect Liverpool to be sniffing and also Valencia too. Great achievements in staying up, yet the future looks bleaker than many think and hope.  

16th Aston Villa

Villa must be very thankful that the “39th” game was not part of this season. Because one more game may have been relegation for this side. A painful end to the season, where the animosity of fans reached fever pitch, eventually Villa survived, yet only just. The board, of Lerner and Faulkner have much to answer for the rather ludicrous and obviously catastrophic appointment of Alex McLeish last summer. The fans played a part too though, complaining about every manager linked to the job, most notably Steve McLaren, who said what you like about his England career, has shown he is a very good manager of “good” players (Forest were a problem waiting to happen). Of all the managers to choose though they went for the relegated Birmingham one. Well, they are very lucky that their “gamble” did not lead to relegation and they have acted swiftly in removing McLeish, yet questions must remain about their decision making and knowledge of the club and fans. McLeish can blame injuries to key players, yet the truth is he has not brought out the best in any players and with a decent crop of young players coming through, they will need someone to push them on and play the kind of football they have been doing in the youth and reserve ranks.


Next season will be interesting, with the next appointment needed to be a good one; with names like Lambert and Martinez being bounded around. The fans need inspring, yet rest assured the future is that of austerity for Villa. Do not expect the money spent under O’Neill, where losses of £50m were reported. Lerner burnt his fingers on his quest for Champions League football, he won’t do the same again. Expect mid table mediocrity for the coming seasons. The fans need to expect that but what they want is to be entertained. This has been the worst thing about the season; some of the most negative and dull football in the league was played by Villa, and no wonder many neutrals dislike this side. A new man will need to win the fans over and the players inspired and motivated to play football which gets results and entertains. A tall order for a team under austerity measures?

17th QPR

In some ways many hoped that QPR would go down. What with Warnock’s constant moaning and clear inability in this League to Barton’s antics throughout, QPR were not an enjoyable side this season. And it seemed relegation was a shoe in when considering their fixtures in the run in. Mark Hughes was the man given the task of keeping them up and he appeared to be struggling severely early on, especially when his big signing Cisse seemed intent on espionage. However, the turning point came against Liverpool, who not totally unsurprisingly threw away a two goal lead and allowed QPR to snatch a 3-2 win. That was the turning point, and wins against Spurs and a late one against Stoke gave the fans real belief that survival was possible. By all accounts it was out of their hands on the last day, yet somehow were winning 2-1 at City in the 89th min, only to lose 3-2. Yet with Bolton unable to win, they were safe. 


It will be interesting to see what happens this summer; Fernandes has promised major investment and it may be that Hughes is given a war chest to improve the squad. And it certainly needs improving; too many Championship players are in this side and improvements in all areas is required. Dealing with Joey Barton was the best decision Newcastle made and so QPR must act the same and rid the club of this average and volatile member who like a cancer kills a team from within.

18th Bolton

Owen Coyle is regarded as an excellent young manager who plays good exciting football. Clearly these people have not seen Bolton play. Many excuses can be made for the failing of Bolton this year; injuries to Holden and Lee Chung-Yong affected the team this season as they were key to Bolton last year. Yet not replacing Sturridge and Elmander was a big failing, N’gog clearly not a suitable replacement and for £4million questions must be asked of Coyle. 


Many will blame the Muamba incident yet it may have been a positive, results temporarily improved for Bolton after that, yet if those who think Bolton went down because of it, are much mistaken. In the first 18 games, Bolton won four times and lost fourteen. They conceded 77 goals, the third worst in the league and so no surprise that they were the third worst side. The introduction of Bogdan was clearly a factor and although he looks the part, it is very risky giving a young keeper “experience” when your survival rests on it. Yet the defence in front did not help; Wheater, Knight, Ricketts, Robinson and Ream are not good enough for this league, as individuals they are poor and as a unit they are atrocious. 


Bolton are in heavy debt and relegation be a major blow to this side. They believed Coyle would propel them up the league playing great football, yet when training consists of 5 a side with clearly no work on organisation and shape, then expect relegation. Worrying times for this club now, clearly their better players like Mark Davies and Holden will be sought by others and it may be a while to we see them in the “Barclays Premier League” again.

19th Blackburn

A sad story of the ill’s of foreign ownership, of poor management and of the impact of fans. Blackburn Rovers have been simply embarrassing this season, from the owners to the players. Steve Kean apparently stabbed Allardyce in the back to the get the job, convincing the new owners that he could take the club to the heights of the Champions League. When names like Raul, Beckham and Ronaldinho were being touted you wondered if they were serious about the club or if they had not watched any football for 10 years?! As players like Phil Jones were being sold, Goodwillie and Dann were being brought in. It is safe to say the fans were not impressed. And performances showed as much. Some highlights included the defeats of Arsenal and United, yet generally the fans were not wrong. They knew the truth, that their club was being run by people who did not understand football and was being managed by a man who clearly was out of his depth. I cannot condone the actions of the fans however, their abuse of Kean was at times savage and uncalled for, yet how he managed to continue in the role was rather amazing; the toll it must have took on him psychologically must have been huge. 


The thing is though, Blackburn should not have been relegated, they have a good enough side to stay up, and with the right man they could have. Hoillet, Yakubu, Formica, Rochina and N’Zonzi are all good players, yet they lacked guidance and belief this season. Kean was often cut an isolated figure on the side, and it appeared that he was going to be the Captain who went down with the ship, admirable or foolish? Either way, he cannot continue next season surely? The owners, who credit to them have cleared the debts of the club, face a massive task of getting Blackburn back in. With many players to leave, it will need a new man to guide this young squad back, and will take the fans to support them too. With Kean there, this simply won’t happen.

20th Wolves

They say the table doesn’t lie and in Wolves case it doesn’t. In 25 games Mick McCarthy had accumulate 21 points, Wolves lied in 18th and there was much negativity coming from the fans about his capability as manager. Many argued that he should have left the summer before, only scraping survival through goal difference. Yet what did the fans realistically expect of this club? Relegation was always going to be a possibility for this club, and so for McCarthy to have kept them in the league for two seasons prior was an achievement to be celebrated, not vilified. 



McCarthy perhaps made two big errors in signing Roger Johnson and immediately making him captain, clearly causing issues with the rest of the squad and on his own performances, clearly not a very good defender. Signing Jamie O’Hara was also a mistake, the difference between a player on loan, proving to his “bigger” club that he can do it, and one who is now signed permanently, was clearly seen in how little O’Hara did this season. Yet with the old adage of be careful what you wish for, McCarthy was sacked after losing 5-1 at home to West Brom, which while a terrible performance, showed of being reactive by the board. No replacement was in the wings and two weeks of utter shambles in recruiting the new boss led to much laughter at the constant rejection of managers of the ilk of Curbishley and Bruce. 


Things hit rock bottom with the appointment of Terry Conor, McCarthy’s assistant, who although liked by the players, was not really the best man for a side struggling with confidence and needing serious work. The decision was shown to be complete disaster with only four points collected from the 13 remaining games, all draws. Wolves had shot themselves in the foot and what was once a proud side which actually competed, now looked like an empty vessel plummeting to the Championship. The board have a lot do next season, already surprising the fans and players with the appointment of a manger who managed to get Lukas Podolski’s Cologne relegated this season. With players like Jarvis, Fletcher and Doyle clearly showing being capable of performing in the Premier League, then expect tough times ahead for Wolves. The board must be held accountable for terrible decisions this season.

Agree? Disagree? Find me on Twitter @The_W_Address



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

A Widening Gap Between The Neighbours


The noisy neighbours have certainly made a lot of noise this season and sit back on top of the Premier League with two games remaining. City have overtook United in quality and position, it seems that the gap between the two will only get wider.



According to Sheikh Mansour Manchester City are ahead of schedule in their quest of world domination. This is quite remarkable considering the investments made in the past five years, yet there is clearly a long term plan which is planning for the following decades and not just a short term trophy haul built of faulty foundations.  

There should be no surprise that City are top of the league; since 2006 Man City have spent £530m on players, and have a wage bill of around £180m a year. There is of course issues concerned with financial doping, yet the truth is that in a short space of time Man City are now the best team in England. The only surprise to this season is that they haven’t won the league already. Some terrible form away from home has allowed their rivals United to make a charge of their crown, however in the “biggest game of the season” City took back the top spot, and regardless of the money spent, City deserve to be there.

A power shift in Manchester

On Monday night the game billed as the game of the season, the game which would decide the Premier League, this was perhaps overhyped in some respects, yet the lesson learnt from the match was that City had now overtook United not just in position but in terms of quality. The 6-1 victory at Old Trafford was seen as an anomaly, one of those freak games where the result just doesn’t reflect the match itself. Excuses were made for United, especially going down to 10 men. Their apparent desire to keep attacking when the score was at 3-1 was the reason why they ended up conceding six. However, the excuses could not hide that Man City’s quality was so much better than United’s. 

The game at the Etihad confirmed that City are a better side. Ferguson’s team selection said as much. Gary Neville said he chose that side based on the game against Arsenal when Nani destroyed Clichy and Park supported Rooney in a counter attacking 4-5-1. They won 3-1. Yet that was Jan 2010, over two years ago. If that was Ferguson’s rationale then he was very much mistaken. Two years is a long time and importantly, Man City are not Arsenal. What Ferguson was admitting was that his side was inferior to their neighbours and that if they could get away with a draw then they would be happy. The problem is,  United don’t have the quality in defence and midfield to play for a draw and City have qualities all over the pitch to keep a clean sheet and score goals. 

There is nothing wrong with playing with a five man midfield, it is a necessity in order to prevent a team like City dominating possession in midfield and preventing space for Silva, Nasri and Tevez to pick up the ball. However, to play Rooney on his own against the quality of City was not a tactic which was going to lead to anything positive. As was shown, Rooney got frustrated, had limited support and became a non-entity. No shots on target in a game from United shows how well City defended and how badly United attacked. Surely Welbeck up front on his own would have caused City more problems as he likes run in behind and into channels. Rooney dropping into his preferred 10 role would have given him more chance to link up play and get more possession of the ball. 

Valencia would have been a better option out wide, his directness and crossing quality would have given Clichy more to deal with and the centre backs more to worry about with quality coming in. Why Park played is rather ridiculous; he has garnered a reputation for being a “big” game player yet what this means is that he runs around and breaks up play. It didn’t work against Barcelona and it certainly didn’t work this time. There is a reason why he hadn’t played for four months previously, the thing is, if you your best and only asset is work rate and speed, then if you lose that, you don’t contribute anything.

This season United have shown their vulnerabilities in defence; a major loss has been Vidic, yet De Gea, Evra, Jones, Smalling and the Da Silva's are not good enough for a side of United. I have discussed the problems in defence before, the stats showing 33 goals conceded this season and 19 at home, is the highest amount of goals conceded by United at home in the Premier League. The truth is, United's cloak of invincibility has dropped, teams like City, Newcastle, Bilbao and even Wigan have decided to go at United and have beaten them, where once United were seen as invincible, sides now believe they can defeat this side. That is worrying for United. 

Simply, Ferguson got this last game wrong, and what it showed both sets of fans is that there has been a major power shift in Manchester; a major change in the quality and importantly the futures of both sides.

Abu Dhabi conquest      

Since deadline day on August 31st 2008 Man City have made their intentions very clear. Immediately the purchase of Robinho showed the world that a new power had emerged. How big this side could be was up for question, was this going to be a though out process or a Madrid style Galactico experiment. History will show that these new owners were very serious about developing the world’s greatest side.

Sheikh Mansour has invested £1 billion into the club and the results are not surprising. Credit to the City owners who have not just sought to develop a world class side for the present, but they have a major interest in investing for the future of the club and have put a £100 million plan in place to develop a youth academy which can rival that of Barcelona and other European giants.  They have also invested into community projects and are seeking to be a major part in the long term future of the club.

Compare them to Abramovich at Chelsea who looks at his club as a personal hobby, a past time to enjoy the billions he has accumulated. He has goals to be successful yet the long term is questionable; his side is 90 minutes away from reaching his holy grail, yet his handling of managers, and lack of interest in really developing the club for the future has led to a side which competed strongly domestically and in Europe for the past eight years, to now be an ageing squad with their last hurrah being the final in Munich. 

Man City seem different to Chelsea. They appear to be very pleased with slowly developing this club, importantly building strong foundations which enable the club to build healthily and be stronger in the long term. The future looks very bright for City, yet their successful neighbours appear to be going in the other direction.

United’s gradual decline

In 2008 Man Utd were crowned double winners after winning the Champions League and the Premier League, a title win the following the year and another Champions League final indicated this United side were one of the top sides in world football. With world class players like Ronaldo, Rooney, Vidic and Scholes this side appeared one of Ferguson’s best. They were playing some of the best football seen at Old Trafford too and it seemed that United were built for the future and playing football befitting the needs of the modern game. At this time the ownership of the Glazer’s was a somewhat muted subject; all appeared positive. The initial issues which fans brought up before the Glazer's take over were now subdued, success had quelled the protests.  

However, that final in Rome against Barcelona showed that United were a little bit off their Catalan compatriots; and if they wished to regain their Champions League crown then serious work was needed in the transfer market. However, that summer, instead of improve the side, they diminished it; out went world class talents in Ronaldo and Tevez, replacing them with Antonio Valencia, Gabriel Obertan and Michael Owen. To say this was underwhelming was an understatement. What it had shown was that United were no longer one of the biggest sides in world football, financially. Madrid’s desire for Ronaldo and willingness to pay £80 million is a price you cannot refuse, yet what happened to this money, only £25 million was spent that summer, leaving a net of around £65 million. The question which arose from the fans was, where is the money?

In the season of 09/10 there was a lot of unrest and protests from the United fans because of the Glazer ownership, for the first time since their initial takeover in 2005 they were being seriously questioned about their intentions and running of the club. United had lost their best player and had not properly replaced him, as other sides around Europe were improving, United appeared to be in a state of decline. 

Although United won the title again last season, I believe that teams like Chelsea and Arsenal had an ideal opportunity in which they threw away, City were getting closer to the top and with new owners Liverpool appeared rejuvenated to push forwards this season. Although apart from City these sides have struggled this year, the future looks positive for these sides because of their finances. 

Champions League = Investment

The sense at City is that the sky is the limit. Is this unfair? Has football become a plaything of the rich with success coming to the richest men? Is the debt that clubs like City and Chelsea and even Madrid and Barcelona, healthy and sustainable for the future of the game. Unfortunately, it is. Your debt is only relevant relative to the owners and in the case of the billionaire owners, £500 million is not unsustainable. For the Spanish giants, with their influence on society so strong, their debt is manageable and even inconsequential.

Credit to sides like Arsenal and Dortmund, who with sustainable models of development have managed to stay in touch with the might of those around them. Yet, the truth of the matter is that money talks. The best two sides in the world football are the ones who pay the highest wages. In any business, if you want the best then you pay them the best. As much as any fan complains and finds the world of football baffling, the truth is that there are no rules holding these clubs back. 

As for financial fair play, the only thing this will do is make the bigger teams bigger and will prevent the smaller teams growing. By not allowing a club to exceed their limits, the rules will restrict sides to challenge the top sides around them. For the big sides there are ways around financial fair play; Liverpool have shown how to get over it by signing a new kit sponsorfor £25 million a year. Warrior sports, who also sponsor John Henry’s other team, the Boston Red Sox. This company will be looking to use Liverpool as their global marketing tool, so qualification for the Champions League is a necessity.

With only four sides from the Premier League being able to qualify for the Champions League, there will be big sides who will fail to qualify for the lucrative tournament. With Man City appearing nailed on for it for years to come and teams like Chelsea and Liverpool looking to invest heavily still in order to reach the tournament, with Arsenal appearing ready to invest now their stadium is close to being paid off then all signs point to the somewhat precarious future of Man Utd. Will United invest this summer in order to keep up with those around them?

You may think I am being crazy in this belief that United could drop out of the top four, yet the most decorated English side in the past twenty years, with arguably one of the best managers ever in the game are in serious danger of dropping out of the elite echelons of world football. Since 2009, United have been on a steady path of decline. And the reason is the owners and their lack of genuine investment.

As Jose once said – different eggs, different omelette

Comparing the players that City have bought in the last two years to United shows the difference in financial might and future direction. One team is investing to be the best in the world, the other is trying hard to keep up. When people say this is the worst United side they have seen for a long time, they are right. The quality of player at United is not what it was, and the decline of this side since 2009 has been evident. 

It is their manager who has managed to retain their challenge for trophies, his drive and desire to win has kept United challenging, however without Ferguson, I believe United are a Europa League side. There is an issue at United; a need for better quality is obvious. Ferguson has been publicly supportive of the Glazer’s, they have obviously given United some money to spend, yet it is clearly not enough. The incident when Rooney spoke out about the future of the side was deemed by many to be unprofessional and disrespectful, yet he was right.  I would not be surprised if Rooney was pushed into his outburst from Ferguson, a man with his hands tied perhaps used his main asset to push the hand of the owners. 

To show the lack of quality they have had to bring back a retired player in Scholes in order to keep up with City this season, that will not work next season. Investment will be needed. I question thesignings of Jones, Smalling and Young in regards to level required for a team like United. I don’t see potential world class in these players. Big money players like Nani, Berbatov and Anderson have been failures and where money has been spent, it has not been effective. 

The worry must be that each season now, City will move further ahead of their rivals. Like Madrid and Barcelona, sides which seemed on United’s level have now left them behind. City are doing the same thing now and I can see Chelsea and Liverpool doing the same too.

United – dying a slow death with these owners

It was interesting a few months back when Ferdinand spoke of “delaying” City’s rise and winning the league, yet it would appear that they have not done enough to delay or keep up with the side in blue.

It seems that delaying something as unstoppable as City’s rise to the top is the most worrying aspect for United fans. Do they have owners who are willing to invest in the side to bring in real quality talent? Or is the Glazer family more interested in using United as their bankroll for their other interests. It is a sad state of affairs that is happening at United. Success hid the issues, allowed criticism to be hushed, yet like in 2010, protests will happen more often and the issue will be raised louder. If City do win the league this year then fingers must be pointed at the United board for their allowing of the team to get in the state it is in.

The future doesn't have to look bleak, yet the key must be to get the Glazer's out. I am sure that there are billionaires who see United as a worthy purchase, no doubt the Glazer’s would accept a £1 billion offer too. For United fans, they must hope this happens soon, because the longer the Glazer’s are at Old Trafford, the further away United will be from the cream of the crop. These are worrying times.

While City are investing £500 million into a world class squad, the Glazer's are taking out the same amount to fund their own interests and not that of the club. Foreign ownership has it’s advantages, ask Chelsea and City fans, yet it has it’s problems too. A side like United were always going to be an ideal acquisition, yet the questions should have been asked of the suitability and intentions of these owners. While Shiekh Mansour appears willing to make City the best team in the world, the Glazer’s, like a slow cancer, are gradually diminishing United, and in front of our eyes we are seeing the gradual decline of one of football's great. United fan’s need to act now before it is too soon and the club drops out of the elite of football.

Thoughts on this article are always welcomed...find me at @The_W_Address



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...