Showing posts with label total football. Show all posts
Showing posts with label total football. Show all posts

How total football was made at Barcelona


How one man's philosophy influenced a nation and bred an era of success in Catalonia 


In 1974, the national team of Holland played football in a way we hadn't seen before, with skill, strength, intelligence and attitude merged together into a mixture that was uniquely theirs. They didn't actually win the World Cup but they created a set of memories that have lasted a generation and will continue undimmed for a long while to come.


The 1970s saw the invention of Total Football pioneered by the revolutionary coach Rinus Michels and played by the charismatic playmaker Johan Cruyff. This Dutch team showed the world how football could and should be played; with sheer beauty and movement that was not seen before. This is still regarded as the best team that never won the World Cup.


The captain of the Brazilian team that won the 1970 FIFA World Cup, Carlos Alberto, went on to say "The only team I’ve seen that did things differently was Holland at the 1974 World Cup in Germany. Since then everything looks more or less the same to me…. Their ‘carousel’ style of play was amazing to watch and marvellous for the game.”

In the past decades there have been the great sides of Ajax and Milan who possessed these ideas of totalfootball. Yet it is today where we are seeing total football at it's best. Barcelona today are the result of Rinus Michels philosophy in the 1970’s; this side have sought to entertain and inspire fans with football described as nothing other than mesmerising. 

Michel’s managed Barcelona from 1971-75, managing the Holland team in 1974 for the World Cup. His protege was Johann Cruyff, a player encapsulated his style. After Ajax's 1971 European Cup win he was recruited by Barcelona to bring this style of football to Spain. This would be a defining moment in the history of Spanish football and where the foundations of total football and youth development were put in place for the present day.


Michels brought Johann Cruyff to the Camp Nou in 1973 and the in 1974 Barcelona won the league title. Michels managed Barcelona again with Cruyff in 76-78 and then both him and Cruyff left. In 1988 Cruyff arrived back at Camp Nou as the manager, taking the side to four league titles, a cup winners cup and a European cup success. He brought in players like Koeman, Michael Laudrup, Romario, Hagi and Stoichkov and brought through a young talent from the youth set up in Josep Guardiola. 


Cruyff took him under his wing and made him his captain, wanting him to be the coach on the pitch. His education from Cruyff had a major impact on his thinking, believing unconditionally in the ways of Cruyff.


Josep Guardiola was the first of the production line of young products which we associate with Barcelona today; deemed too small for Barcelona at first, he was frail and tiny, lacking what the coaches believed the necessary qualities for the game. However he saw what nobody else saw, he anticipated everything that was going to happen. 


The modern day

Fast forward to the end of the 2007/2008 season and Barcelona were a team lacking ideas, motivation and belief. A third place finish, 18 points behind the winners Madrid would indicate that the side who won the Champions League is 2006 were now a shadow that side. Changes needed to be made, Rijkaard was shown the door and a new man was brought in. 

Pep Guardiola was the man who the board believed could galvanise this side. A great player for Barcelona in the 90’s yet with limited experience, having only spent two seasons coaching the “B” side. 

Guardiola's appointment at Barcelona was questioned by many as folly. Here was a man with no experience in managment coaching one of the best sides in the world. However, his education under Cruyff and he his experiences in Italy and Mexico meant he was more qualified for the role than many would realise. 

In his first meeting with squad, those doubts would be squashed,  Xavi recalls, “instantly I could sense a different atmosphere, new standards.  Standards had skipped, a kilo here of there, a few minutes late did not matter. Now everything mattered, Pep was on top of everything like a hawk.”

He won the confidence and respect of the players with his approach. Unity was the first thing he sought. At 37 he appeared too young, yet he told the players that “if you think I’m going to be soft on you, an easy touch, simply because I’m only 37 then you are wrong. My pride and ambition are enormous, and let’s be clear, you’re going to work hard.”

He intended to bring back glory to the Camp Nou, and do it with the quality which was expected of this great club. He began by moving out the disruptive and dysfunctional players like Ronaldinho, Deco, Zambrotta, Edmilson and Dos Santos were all deemed surplus to the new plans of the new boss. In came his players; Dani Alves, Keita, Hleb and Pique from United; the former La Masia graduate. He also promoted players who he worked with in the B side; Busquets, Pedro, Jeffren.


The philosophy that Michels and Cruyff introduced to Barcelona was implemented by Guardiola and has given the game players which perhaps we would not have seen. A focus on what the player can do with the ball, an emphasis on technical ability and creativity, on being intelligent have given the game players who perhaps would be deemed "too small and frail" for certain countries. A philosophy focusing on developing footballers and not just athletes has made Barcelona the best team in the world today.   

How he achieved it

Guardiola is a purest, a man who expects not just to win, but to win with style. He has shown that he will not change his philosophy, at times showing a stubbornness that his way supersedes everything else.  His mentality is positive; to play to win rather than playing not to lose. He tells his players to play for the people who pay to watch them, coming from a respect he has for the supporters, believing they deserve to be entertained.

People will say that he has been lucky to inherit such talents as Messi, Iniesta and Xavi, that he facilitates more than coaches this side. However, this belief is false and ignorant to the work that he does on the training pitch. He is one of the most tactically astute coaches in the game. His level of commitment, focus and determination fosters a motivation and belief which has transformed a team possessing clearly quality yet lacking guidance into one of the greatest side in world football, ever. Like Mourinho he is obsessively detailed, studying opponents, with banks of DVD’s, books and magazines. 

His side is drilled to perfection; when players talk of his coaching they talk of an educator, a man who explains "why" in everything he does. They learn and believe in his ways because he convinces them that what he says is true. The results and performances show that he has worked his magic on this team, they work as a team, as a unit, always together. 


Man management, the key ingredient for success

Guardiola has shown his managerial talents in creating world class players and a world class team. In the summer of 2008 Xavi Hernandez talks about the board deeming him surplus to requirements that summer, the board decided that a new era was needed. Yet Guardiola had different ideas, stating that Xavi would be the key to his team. He saw in Xavi himself, the fulcrum for his total football tactic to work, he required a coach on the pitch. His performances at Euro 2008 and onwards have shown how a player like Xavi, when used correctly can control and dominate a game like no other.

And what of Leo Messi, the worlds best player. When Pep took over he was not the best, yet he had the potential. And it would be his first decision which would influence how Messi would view him. 

That summer Messi was desperate to go to the Olympics to win gold for his country, however the board at Barcelona were adamant that he was needed for their Champions League qualifier. Guardiola made sure Messi went to represent his country, himself winning gold for Spain in 1992. Messi would go and win the gold, Barca would qualify for the Champions League and a bond would be made that would go on and take this side to the heights of the gods. It is these decisions which define a manager and cement relationships which are capable of great things. 


Guardiola has proved his skills and talent in producing the world's best team. However, in 2010 Jose Mourinho, one of the best managers in the past decade arrived at the Santiago Bernabeu and looked to dethrown Barcelona from their seat as the best. His arrival has given the world a rivalry filled with high quality football mixed with theatre and mind games which has made El Clasico the highlight of the football calender. 


Click here for the article on Jose vs Pep - who is the greatest? 



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

El Clasico, who is the Special One?



With the Champions League draw providing the potential for a Barcelona vs Madrid final, I thought it would be of importance to judge their respective managers in this most enthralling battle.  






They say the greats are defined by moments which have the potential to make or destroy careers.


March 10, 2004, Old Trafford.
Manchester United lead FC Porto 1-0 at Old Trafford. A 2-1 defeat in Portugal means United are set to advance on away goals to the next round of the UEFA Champions League. FC Porto forward Benni McCarthy launched a seemingly non-threatening injury time free kick right at Howard as his coach Jose Mourinho looked on. Howard made a big error, dropping the routine catch, which allowed Ricardo Costinha to score the winning goal and send Manchester United crashing out. Porto would go on to win the Champions League and put Mourinho’s name in the history books. 

Wednesday 6th May 2009, Stamford Bridge. 
93rd Minute. Essien fails to clear the ball, Messi passes across the area to Andres Iniesta, a first time shot, top corner goes past the flailing arms of Petr Cech. Barcelona are through to the final of the Champions League.Guardiola would go on to beat Man Utd in the final and go on to create the greatest side in world football.

These two moments in recent football history have shaped the football landscape of the present day. These significant moments changed the course of each manager’s history. 

Was it fate which put these two men to heights of greatness, who now manage the two best teams in world football? Jose Mourinho was fortunate to meet and work with Bobby Robson, a manager who taught Mourinho about how to work with players, how to get the most from them. His education from Robson was invaluable and it is this relationship would gave Mourinho the opportunity to work at top clubs like Porto and Barcelona. 


Guardiola was lucky for other reasons; as a young player he was deemed by many to be too small and thus not strong enough for top level football. However, his opportunity came because of Johann Cruyff, who viewed the game differently to many. He was brought on the philosophy of total football and he brought this mentality to the Camp Nou. His view of how football should be played and of what type of player was necessary for the style to work, propelled Guardiola from the fringes to the spotlight, being Cruyff's coach on the pitch. 


Both managers received an education from two of the best managers in the game, both spent time at one of the greatest clubs in the world and for a short period, both worked together. One as coach, one as player. How fitting that almost twenty years later these men are regarded as the two best coaches in world football, orchestrating a battle between two of the best sides in the world. 

Pre El Clasico

In the second leg of the Champions League final Guardiola's Barcelona were 3-1 down Mourinho's Inter. Many people regard this game as the one of the best lessons in coaching and tactics from Mourinho. 


Down to ten men after just half an hour, Mourinho instructed his side to drop deep and create a block. They simply asked Barcelona to break them down, which they could not do, requiring  two goals to qualify they only scored one. Inter did not have a single shot in the whole game. It was certainly a case of Beauty and the Beast and on this occasion, the Beast won. Mourinho had beaten the beautiful game.


It was Mourinho’s celebrations at the final whistle which would begin what was to become a hatred between Mourinho and the Camp Nou, cementing Mourinho as enemy number one.

How fitting then, that he would be the man required to take Madrid back above Barca. And thus what would ensue would be some of the most vociferous and toxic battles in the history of El Clasico.


Mourinho's arrival at the Bernabeu 


Since Mourinho’s appointment at Santiago Bernabeu, the media and fans have pondered, who is the greatest? Mourinho has certainly accomplished a lot in his career, however has he met in Barca and in Guardiola his equal.

In  Barcelona and Real Madrid we have two of the biggest names in football history, who are currently the two best teams in world football. They possess the best two players in the world and contain the majority of the Spanish side and the FIFA world XI is covered with players from both sides. Without question, Spain are dominating international football and these teams are dominating club football.   

The battle between these two sides has been going for over a century, yet has it been as heated, as explosive as the past two years. Has it ever possessed the quality that we see today? Or has it ever contained the animosity of today? El Clasico has captivated the world. 


After the Inter triumph in the Champions League, the league tie between Barca and Madrid on the 29th November 2010 was billed as one of the biggest games of the season, even the decade. Which team was better? Which coach was the best?


That day was perhaps the best performance from Barcelona in Guardiola's managerial career. With the pressure from the media and fans, the previous encounter against Inter and Mourinho playing his mind games as always, it was testament to the quality of this Barcelona side when they ran out 5-0, giving Mourinho his biggest loss in his managerial career and cementing Barcelona's place as the best. 


From then on, Mourinho has beaten Guardiola only once, 1-0 in the Copa Del Rey. Yet, in all other games and competitions, Barca have come out best. In Guardiola's Barca career his record against Madrid is phenomenal; six wins from seven in the league, a Spanish super cup win and a Champions League semi final win have resulted in the world believing that this side are the best in world football. Guardiola's achievements have seen his side win 14 out of 18 possible trophies, this is truly amazing.  

Has Mourinho met his match?

Jose Mourinho resembles Brian Clough; outspoken, abrasive yet adored by his players and fans. He has been very successful and has conquered many of the managerial greats with his tactics and mind games. Yet he seems forever in search of proving himself and justifying his place in the football world.

Jose Mourinho was never a great player and perhaps this is why his behaviour and demeanour, the way he garners an "us against them" mentality is a reflection of a man who has always been against it, who was perhaps never given the respect he felt he deserved. 

Being referred to as the translator has had an effect on him and this was seen in the second leg of the tie with Inter at the Camp Nou; his celebration appeared more than victory, it seemed to be a way of justifying his position to the fans who perhaps never really respected him.

Mourinho has often been seen as a controversial figure in football; frequently making outspoken comments which result in him facing punishment from the footballing authorities. Mourinho invokes as much anger as respect, a man who at times lacks the humility and modesty required of a true great.  


His way of working has been often criticised, his mind games have riled yet also impressed many. However as of late, his actions and that of his resulting players have been less admirable. If Pepe resemble his manager does this not warrant cause for concern? Success is one thing, yet achieving it by any means is not to be admired. 


Even his style and fashion have been affected, he once came across as a man full of arrogance and confident in his ability, with a look of a model on the catwalk sporting the new winter collection. Recently however, he fashion has become more casual, resembling more of a golfer than the high class manager he is. It would appear that he has met his match, in style and in football in Guardiola and he appears a defeated man. 


Madrid's time now?


Madrid have been simply brilliant this season, yet against Barcelona they have shown a fear, mentally, that they cannot defeat them. The defensive style and the dirty tricks have produced more theatre than quality.  Mourinho has certainly been affected by his inability to overcome this side. His often controversial ways have often found appreciation by his players, yet too often in his time at Madrid, for the first time in his career, Mourinho has been questioned by those he coaches, his style, tactics and manner have all been too much for a club who regard themselves not as the enemy of the people but the kings of the country. This is not behaviour befitting of a king.

Madrid will win the league this season, no doubt about it, and will probably score more goals than ever before. The Champions League is still a possibility too, however, no matter what Madrid win this year, if they cannot beat Barcelona then will their success be soured? I think so.  


More than winning


These two managers are the best in world football today, they deserve nothing but respect and acclaim for what they have achieved in their short careers. Mourinho has done excellently, and his success is unprecedented, like Sacchi he has built his reputation for being a great coach not from being a great player. He is unquestionably one of the greats. Yet has he inspired the world of football as much as Guardiola has? 

Guardiola is a man who has a desire and drive to achieve success, he is different Mourinho however, he believes in attacking football, with the importance on ball retention. He believes and trusts in youth development, not like Mourinho who distrusts inexperience, this is why if Pep decided to leave Camp Nou, then he would be the ideal candidate to replace Ferguson at Old Trafford  instead of Mourinho. 

In another generation Cristiano Ronaldo and Jose Mourinho would dominate world football, however in this era there is a player and a coach who exceed even their abilities. Leo Messi and Guardiola were crowned the best player and coach this year, confirming that they truly are the best. It was fitting that both Ronaldo and Mourinho came runners up. In my opinion this is completely justified, both player and coach have taken football and winning to a new level.


Those who believe anyone could do the job at Camp Nou are delusional, he is one of the best tacticians in the game today, outthinking the “Special One” on more than several occasions.  Pep Guardiola, is the antithesis of Mourinho, in his manner, in his approach to the game and how he handles the media. He has fashioned a style which has mesmerised fans and received acclaim over the whole world, this takes something very special to garner this kind of respect. 



The domestic league is almost irrelevant this season, what is key is the Champions League. Both sides have the potential to get to the final and the victor will be regarded as the best. If Barcelona do it then they will undoubtedly be regarded as the best team in the history of football, better than the Ajax side of the early 70's, the Liverpool side of the 80's and the Milan of the early 90's. 


In the 1970’s Rinus Michels had a dream about how football should be played, yet he did not get the relative success his style deserved. What he did was put in place a way of playing football that was taken from Holland to Catalonia, and it is from those foundations built over twenty years ago that we witness a side today who epitomise his vision, playing football in a way that is so simple, yet so beautiful.



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Youth development – a need for a change in the culture of this country

Why English players have been ruined by a poor philosophy








They say football is a game of opinions. That is true. Yet when one man’s opinion about how to play the game was taken on board, a country was laid in ruin.  The results were seen for years to come.

In the 1980’s Charles Hughes was the director of FA coaching for the English Football Association. He authored the FA's official coaching manual and put in place what was to be the biggest disaster ever to hit English development. Hughes was an advocate of long ball tactics, ideas developed and taken on by notably the failed England manager Graham Taylor. His concept was that more goals were scored from three passes or less, meaning too many passes results in less goals. This complete over simplification of the game has resulted in the stagnation and ultimate failings of the England national side.

The irony is that Hughes went against the style of football being played at that time; Liverpool were dominating Europe with pass and move football and Michels had created a style for Ajax and Holland which was described as the beautiful game. The Brasilans and Argentinians were playing excellent attacking football like they are renowned, yet the ball spent much more time on the floor with these teams than in the air.  In the late 80’s Michels protégé Johan Cryuff  took totalfootball to Barcelona and the rest they say is history.

Imagine what our players could have been like if we had developed a style like this? Total football requires technical masters, without which they could not have played this way.  Possessing the ability to receive and pass with precision, to dribble and beat players 1v1 and to continually support and move for each other, these are the requirements for excellent football. The culture of Holland and now Spain, has been on developing technical players in order to play this way. A focus on technical development became their method of coaching.

What does have an English player possess?

English players have been developed based on Hughes' style. A style based on long ball; requiring a goal keeper or defender to have the ability to hit 60 yard balls into the opposition half, similar to trench warfare. It then required a giant of a man to take this ball out of the air, usually flicking it on and then it needed brave men to win the battle for the ball and hopefully, stick it in the net. Statistics show that 80% of long balls are intercepted., yet this was overlooked. It is crazy to think that this was taken on board and that this was the tactic employed by many managers. 

Even more worrying was that young players were being targeted and developed based on these attributes. No wonder we have never been keen on small, technical players, they did not fit the requirements of long ball football. Thus, they have never been developed en masse.
There have always been excuses for the poorness of our players; the manager, the weather and even luck! Yet for all these there was one problem which was not addressed fully, a flawed philosophy which underpinned the poor quality of coaching in youth development.

The Dutch have always prized technical ability of all else and so they have continually developed players fit for the game. We now have seen Spain develop players capable of playing sublime football and winning. We have seen Germany develop technical, quick players capable of playing at the top level. And the South Americans will always develop technically quick players as their culture demands more than seeks this. And so now we have wokenup to the problems that have destroyed the English game for so long. 


The FA

The FA has invested a billion pounds into the new Wembley. The new training centre at Burton cost £100 million. Would it not have made more sense to develop ten centres around the country instead of build Wembley? Something similar to that of Germany and France with their centres; their most famous being Clairefontaine. Surely if the FA had a real desire to improve the standard of players and coaching in this country then this would have been much more beneficial? This way improving coaches and players with state of the art facilities around the country and not just in one central location.
 
Why did we need to build a new Wembley? What a waste of time and money. We have these monuments as way to verify our standing in the world, yet fill it with mediocrity. In Germany there is no national stadium; games of the national team are always in different cities. This allows more people to see their team and allows more money to put in to key areas.

The FA will say that they have "skills schools" around the country looking to improve players. Yet The FA skills programme was initially set up to work with Elite players, in order to improve their technical skills. However a lack of funding prevented this Elite development from happening, instead Tesco funded an inclusive coaching network where all types of children are coached. This is great, but where is the original Elite level coaching required to take players to the next level?

If we had invested more incoaching then maybe England would have already have more players of the required standard. More coaching schools could have produced more quality English coaches and managers and perhaps even more options for an English national manager. Quite simply The FA have failed the players for not investing in the right thing. New facilities are great, yet when the coaching is mediocre then what point is it?!

Why is talent in this country not being developed to a good standard?

Are English just not good enough or is the result of a highly marketed and highly financia league restricting the access required for English players to develop? Most English players are simply not good enough, and so questions must be asked of the academies who are producing these players.

Players in England are behind the levels of other countries. We develop athletes, putting too much credence on strength and speed and not enough on technical ability or intelligence. We restrict creativity and produce one dimensional players who are predictable and slow. We don't do enough in schools to develop movement, resulting in a lack of variability that footballers require in order to  turn, pivot and change direction at rapid speeds.

Our players lack the key technical skills to cope with top level football. The modern player needs an impeccable touch with both feet and any body part. They need to play off one or touch and have the understanding of where their options are before they receive the ball. They also need to know how to protect the ball and how to beat  a player. These are characterisitics of the greats today, Xavi, Messi, Iniesta. There is only a limited amount of English players with these abilities. 

We lack the coaching skills required to develop technical skills well enough and instead look to develop technique in isolated practices. By developing skill in game situations players will be able to make better decisions in games. Isolated practice restricts players from being effective because they have not practiced under pressure and being faced with multiple decisions.  Watch Michael Carrick when put under prolonged pressure, he panics on the ball and rushes his play. You do not see this with Spanish players. It is because they have been developed to deal with these situations, to make good decisions with the technical skills given to them through coaching. This allows them to adapt to a situation. They are a product of their development pathway, and at this time, their model is more successful and sustainable. 

So why don’t we develop top players, those who have the necessary skills to play at the top level? It leads me to believe that we do not look to recruit or develop intelligent players. We develop players who are reactive, who rely more on the voice of the coach than their own brain. This results in slower reaction times, restricted anticipation and ultimately poor standards of performance. If a player cannot think quick he cannot make quick decisions, he cannot be improved further than his physical body allows. A smart player though is able to be taught the game, to understand about reading the game, anticipating the play. It is these players we need to find and develop; size is not the issue.

Academies, the best standard?

In academies now The FA are looking to implement the new youth modules in order to improve and produce expert teachers of the game. Firstly, they are charging for these instead of making them free, if they believe they are important then every academy coach should be given the courses for no charge. Secondly, they are not focusing enough on genuine technical development, instead they focus more on enjoyment. Now, I don’t disagree with this but at academy level the players are not being challenged enough to move to the next level. It is the foundation, grassroots coaches who need these modules more, they need to learn how to develop players, to teach them. Many coaches know "what" to coach yet do not know "how" to coach. 

Perhaps academies are not producing players good enough for the team because the wrong coaches are working in these environments? The role of a youth coach is that of a teacher. Do these coaches possess the skills needed? Do they have the ability to bond, to be understanding to the players needs, to resonate with their feelings and emotions. Can they communicate the right way? Are they compassionate? Can they be positive and challenge their players? 

These are the key characteristics required for youth coaches to develop all round individuals. Too many coaches are negative and authoritative, they lack understanding and compassion. This is why many kids between 12-16 lose the love of football and do not move to the next level.   

Give English a chance

In the pro game in England teams have decided not to develop players but buy in already proven talent. The English Premier League has become so international, and so success driven, that it seems difficult to produce players through these teams.

What has been done to rectify this? The Germans realised they had a problem in 2000 andaddressed it, The English FA and Premier League have done very little to rectify the problem. There are no rules on how many English players have to play for teams in the league. This has resulted in only 38% of players in the league being English. By developing our own players teams would reduce costs as it is much cheaper to develop talent than buy it and our national team would surely benefit.

If we don’t give our young players the chance to develop up to the age of 23, then we are doing a disservice to our national side and to the development of English talent. Young foreign players are being brought over, especially by the top teams, at the expense of our own. This is simply not right. It is not right for the English players development and not for the foreign player; being moved to a new country at 16 and expected to adapt is not ethical. For all the Fabregas’ of this method, how many have been ruined by this vicious and soulless pursuit of the next Messi?

Would it not be better if young foreign players were not allowed to move abroad until they were 18, more in line with university age, where a player is now a young adult and not an adolescent.

I can understand why top level teams rely on foreign players now, because they believe that English players are not good enough. So more rules need to be implemented to improve the standards of coaching and give more English players a chance to gain the necessary experience in senior level football.

The Premier League, if they genuinely did care about the development of the national side, would make theteams use the 6+5 rule to play English talent weekly, resulting in a minimum of 6 English players playing each week. The current rules enable foreign players to be classed as home grown and allows teams like Arsenal to field non-English sides in the Premier League. How is this helping the national game improve? The future

From abroad we appear a shambles; pristine  new stadia and a manager on £6 million a year yet possessing poor levels of coaching at grassroots and academy level. The FA build top down instead of bottom up and it shows everything that is wrong with England. Too much money at the top trying to fix problems that need addressing at the bottom. Our teaching standards are very poor, throughout all areas. The results of which we are seeing in our children through lack of skills and motivation, apathy and poor attitudes.  We are not producing enough high skilled adults for the modern world and thus we are letting our current and future generations down.

So what is to be done? New plans have been put in place by the Premier League and  FA to improve coaching and development of young players. They believe these plans will develop more players capable of playing at the top level. It is called the Elite Player Performance Plan and this where the next blog will focus.




You can follow the Whitehouse Address on Twitter @The_W_Address


  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...