Showing posts with label Aston Villa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aston Villa. Show all posts

Lambert’s Daunting Task At Villa Park



The philosophy of Martin O’Neill to buy young English talent was both beneficial for the clubs performance in the league and for the profit made of their sales. The major issue which has curtailed Villa in recent years however has been the inability to replace both these players and the manager. The arrival of Lambert seems to have addressed at least one of these issues.





When watching England this summer, it fills a Villa fan with real pride to see players like Young, Milner and Downing in the side, unfortunately injuries to Barry and Cahill restricted even more ex Villa players from playing a part in the current squad. Unfortunately for Villa however, these players had to move on in order to progress their careers. Quite simply, Villa were not big enough for them. 


A difficult two years

Martin O’Neill’s exit was not unexpected, yet the timing of it was. And Randy Lerner appeared unaware of how to deal with it, two years later, poor decisions have took Villa from a 6th place side to a side which survived relegation by a point. The appointment of Alex McLeish was always going to be toxic, what possessed the board to hire him makes you question the decision making and knowledge of the board. 


How could they believe that hiring a relegated, Birmingham City manager, was a good decision? You have to base McLeish’s record not on what he says, but on what he has done. He was simply not the right choice, and if the league had been 39 games long, we would have gone down! A shocking thought, yet one which was very much real. It was not easy for McLeish however; he lost both Young and Downing last summer and was given the remit of cutting costs and wages, for any manager that would be difficult, yet McLeish's problem was that he just didn’t win the fans over. 


In fact he actually made Villa the most hated side in the league! I can’t say the boards decision to sack McLeish was a “good decision”, it was simply them clearing up their own mess. I must say that I blame the fans for their negativity last season of which I am sure did not help the sides performances, yet I can understand their views because McLeish’s tactics and mentality killed the atmosphere. 


The important thing for me is that the fans never act like that again, it was like a cancer, slowly killing the club. And yet, after the storm comes the sun, and although Lerner appeared set on making a mockery out of Villa again, on another managerial hunt, which judging on last summer showed no vision or planning, this time appeared more organised, the board seemed to know what the fans and players wanted. 


Different targets, only one was right


Solskjaer was an interesting target; he was young, had experience of playing for a top side and learning from a top manager in Ferguson and had shown he could achieve success with the sides he managed. My worry however was the weight of the job that Villa offered, it is a very difficult role to take over right now, even though the fans will support anyone coming in, the task of the challenge was great, this is a side who almost got relegated. Not an easy task.


We have seen a real emergence of young British managers in the past few years and it is no surprise that Rogers, Lambert and Houghton have been heavily sought after. Yet for me it had to be Paul Lambert. In my opinion, Lambert is the best of these managers, especially for what is required at Villa. Rogers is very set in his ideology, one which requires specific attributes of his players, those fans wanting Martinez needed to consider the same issue, can our players play this way, or importantly, if they try to play this way, will they stay up? 


A pragmatist is essential


What Lambert represents is pragmatism, perhaps this is seen as a negative word, in fact it is perhaps the most essential part of management. Know your players and adapt your styles to suit them. Villa needed a pragmatist, not an idealist. Lambert has shown at Norwich that he can adapt, be progressive and understand the league and his players. Importantly, he is excellent at bringing in and developing players with relatively little money, this may be an essential skill at Villa.

Lambert has shown a trait of which characterizes the best in football management, the ability to get more from the players you have. Lambert did not just survive this past season with Norwich, he provided a mid table finish, playing some good football. His strength was an insatiable appetite and clear conviction in getting his players to put their all into each game, Ferguson said that the game at Carrow Rd was the hardest United have had this season. 


Foreign education?


For me, Lambert’s qualities come from this previous experiences as a player, his movement from Glasgow to Dortmund is a move not many top British players make and what it gave him was the chance to learn new styles, tactics and play with the quality of players like Matthias Sammer. It also gave him a Champions League winners medal too, a very impressive feat. 


As a coach he then learnt and developed his knowledge in Germany, which I think has been essential for his managerial career. He sees the game differently than many in the English league and it shows in his sides performances this past season. His understanding and ability to change tactics in a game shows a real knowledge of the game and its requirements. Am I pleased he has decided to come to Villa, ecstatic!


A difficult task?


Any manager coming into Villa would galvanise the fans and players, yet Lambert offers us the real hope of making Villa a respectable club again, we have become hated by many under McLeish, Lambert will seek to improve our reputation with the fans and those outside the club. This is important, because Villa needs to become an attractive club to players. Can we reach the heights of the top six, I doubt it, yet our aim in the next three years should be for 7th-10th, this is where I believe Villa are in terms of their standing in the league, it is not a negative, simply we do not have the money or quality to be any higher. 

However, there are issues to address for Lambert to get Villa to this position. As mentioned, we have been stripped of our quality; Milner, Young and Downing are real losses and simply have not been replaced. McLeish did not motivate the players he had, yet was devoid of the quality afforded O'Neill and Houllier previously. I do not expect Villa to spend huge sums on players this summer, Lerner invested heavily under O’Neill and a period of high wages and average players ensued. With the departures of Cuellar and Heskey, Villa are seeking to gradually reduce their wage bill, yet is what we are left with good enough? 


Average, unmotivated squad?

The signings which came in last season were average at best, even Shay Given, although sometimes excellent, has shown for Ireland he has lost some of his ability, and injuries are becoming a recurrent theme for him. What seemed a good signing last summer, appears now to be a risk to continue with. Alan Hutton is perhaps one of the worst full backs in the league and he offers little in an attacking sense to make up for his average defending qualities. As for N’Zogbia, I was disappointed in his application last season, I don’t think McLeish handled him well, though I wonder how much Lambert will enjoy working with him. Lambert has spoken before about how he wants players who will run  through brick walls for the team, I question N’Zogbia’s willing to do this. Thus, the replacements brought in last summer have all been poor signings, offering very little for Lambert.

As for what else Lambert has to work with, there are issues all over the pitch and perhaps only a few bright sparks. Firstly defensively, I question the mobility of Collins and Dunne, and worry that in Cuellar, we have lost our best central defender. In Nathan Baker we appear to have a potentially decent player, yet I have not seen enough to believe he can be a starter. Our best option may be Ciaran Clark, who although has shown his ability in midfield, is much more needed in defence. Rumours of interest from West Ham in Collins should be seriously considered, his wages are high and we should seek to move him on. It means however that we need a centre back to come in, potentially with speed and mobility. 


We also need to consider our full back issues of Warnock and Collins. Licah and Herd may be possibilities to replace these two, yet I am conscious that our squad is very thin on depth and importantly experience. As for midfield, Petrov’s illness is a real shame for the man, however I felt he was finished at Villa last summer, we need to now consider replacing him. Herd and Clark have played in these areas this past season, yet I feel we need more in there. Makoun is a puzzling situation, personally I think he would be perfect for what we need, yet I question how much desire he has to stay at Villa and again, will Lambert like him? 


There are players like Delph and Ireland who have not impressed enough for their value and who I believe we should seek to move them on. However, does anyone want them? And it leaves the issue of squad size. Carruthers and Gardner have shown they possess potential ability yet Bannan has not impressed since his drink driving incident, however we must seek to bring in players who can carry these young players as they develop. 


Out wide I believe we need to consider bringing in at least one player to motivate N'Zogbia and Albrighton (who I do believe can flourish under Lambert). We have always seemed to lack a creative midfield player and it is important we look to bring one in, I believe that Johnny Howson, recently bought by Lambert from Leeds would be a great addition to the side, however the issues of bad relations between the clubs will possibly effect this potentially great signing. 


Up front, I believe in Weimann Villa have a real gem, who will need playing time this season to develop further. As for Bent and Agbonlahor, I believe Villa will stick with them, yet I would consider selling at least one of them. If an offer of £20 million came in for Bent, I would be inclined to accept it. Yet if an offer of £10 million came in for Gabby, I would choose that deal instead. Bent gives you goals and he, like the others, has clearly been affected by McLeish and the atmosphere this past season, a new lease of life into the club may be perfect for Bent, who is a prolific scorer. Whereas Gabby is just not good enough, Weimann shows much more potential, those Villa fans who love Gabby need to view him objectively, he lacks the quality, understanding and finishing ability to be a top player, he is not young either, at 25 he does not indicate future potential, meaning that what you see is what you get, which is simply not good enough.

Realistic targets?


And who are realistic targets for Villa this summer? For me, Villa’s targets should be; in defence, Grant Hanley from Blackburn, the Scottish international has impressed in a difficult Blackburn side and at only 20, he offers a bright future. In midfield I would be tempted to go to Blackburn again and bring in Steven N’Zonzi, I believe at 23 the French midfielder is too good for Blackburn and could give Villa much needed quality in midfield. Another midfielder we should seek to replace Petrov is Diame at Wigan, he is a player who could offer a lot to Villa’s midfield to add intensity and strength, which has been lacking in recent seasons. 


To add extra creativity to the midfield I think Villa should consider either Howson or Mark Davies, players who will give the creativity Villa currently lack. Out wide there have been rumours of Adam Johnson being available on loan, he would be a top class player for Villa and would certainly provide more than our current wingers. 


There has been talk also of a possible loan deal involving Daniel Sturridge, for me this would be a great signing, he showed his class at Bolton and at times for Chelsea last season, yet it seems he is being phased out with the new arrivals at Stamford Bridge and he will be wanting to play and impress rather than sit on the bench. Other than him I believe Steven Fletcher is the obvious choice, far too good for the Championship and a player who can offer a lot to Villa. Another to consider may be Nicholas Bendtner, he can be a very talented player for a mid table Premier League side and a consistent run in the side will bring out the best of him. 


Yet these may only be considerations if Bent was sold, £20m is a lot of money and it would give Lambert the funds needed to build his squad. Let us not forget that Lambert is excellent at bringing in lower league players and getting them to perform in the top league, this will be important as he looks to build a side on relatively little.


A daunting task ahead


All in all Lambert has a very difficult yet exciting task ahead, there is much work to do at Villa, work which requires an austerity mentality of cutting wages and receiving potentially little support in the transfer market. A daunting task perhaps and Lambert was keen to dismiss talk of expectations. Yet Lambert is the best man for the job, his mentor was O’Neill and you can see this in his demeanour and character, yet he appears more astute and Villa are very lucky to have attained the services of one of the best young coaches not just in England but in Europe. 


In recent years we have seen Jurgen Klopp take an under performing Dortmund side to the top of the Bundesliga, I doubt whether Lambert can achieve this, yet they are similar individuals and Villa is not so far different to the situation Klopp inherited; a period of financial austerity, a strong youth academy and a club which has a strong history which has fell off in recent years. It is an exciting time for Villa with their new man and I hope the fans bring back a positive atmosphere and by doing so the players and club can be galvanised, this will be key if we wish our club to progress back up the table. I for one though wish to welcome Lambert, I am very excited about our new manager and the new era which awaits our club.  


For more football related articles -
follow The Whitehouse Address here & on Twitter at @The_W_Address

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Aston Villa. A Time for Austerity



So Aston Villa embark on perhaps the biggest three games in their history, games which could determine the future of the club. These are not about winning trophies, or getting into the top four, this is much more serious. It is about survival. 



Villa lie in 15th, with 35 points from 33 games. The next three games are against Sunderland, Bolton and West Brom. Many people are saying that 36 points will be enough to stay up, in my opinion Villa must be aiming for 40+ and 6 points must come from these three games.

Last weekend Alex Ferguson came out with support for Alex McLeish, commending the “remarkable job” he has done this season. Yet although Ferguson’s comments can be deemed as mere support for one of his own, it made me think if this season has actually been a success. Are Villa actually in a good position considering their circumstances?

Last season Villa appeared doom for the drop around Christmas; results were not going well and the mess that O’Neill had left was falling apart. Randy Lerner threw Villa are lifeline with the purchase of Darren Bent, who scored 8 goals after January to keep the side up. In the final three games Villa drew one and won two; against Arsenal and Liverpool. The scorers of the goals; Bent, Young and Downing. The thing is this time, we don't have any of those. Remarkably last season they finished 9th, which papered over a lot of cracks.

O’Neill had brought in players to play a certain way, and in all fairness to them they did it well. However, they were not malleable and this led to Villa being poor due to a manager trying to do things that his players couldn’t do. It led to Villa being too open and resulted in 59 goals being conceded. This season they have conceded 48. However, the biggest problem has been scoring goals, this season we average a goal per game.

However for all the doom and gloom out there we won't go down. And the reason we won’t go down is due to our goal difference. Right now it is -13, it is on par with those above us, not below. QPR have -19 and the rest are in the late 20’s or in Wolves case -39. Last season Birmingham had the third worst goal difference in the league, and they duly got relegated. I don’t hear this been talked of often, but it shows that goal difference makes a big difference.

What has gone wrong this season?

Alex McLeish was not a popular appointment for obvious reasons. And yet his reception from the fans has been nothing short of shocking. Those who believe that McLeish has ruined the season need to consider their part in it as much as anyone. Attendances and the atmosphere have been dire at Villa Park and have played a part in the poor performances and results at home.

In my opinion of course he should never have come to the club, even if he hadn’t coached Blues there were better candidates; Houghton and Lambert would have been ideal for us and they have shown they can improve the sides they have worked with. Yet, all credit to McLeish, he has received a lot of criticism from the fans and the media this season and he could have easily blamed a lot of things for the poor results, but he has bit his lip and got on with the job. Has he done well, in my honest opinion, if we don’t relegated it is an accomplishment. When the two favourites for the drop, Swansea and Norwich are clear from relegation, it means there is a chance that your team could be dragged in, it is important to not be their replacement.

Of course there have been too many draws, yet they could easily have been losses, think what happened to the free flowing attacking Blackpool. Defensive security is a big part of a successful side. Perhaps McLeish’s negative tactics have held Villa back from being further up the table, and there appears to be little work done on set pieces which have cost us goals and points. However, it is important to understand and stress the difference in the team this year than the last several years. Fans keep forgetting this.

Losing not one but two of our most effective providers would cause problems for any side. N’Zogbia seemed like a good signing, and many were commending it when he came, yet he has not performed as well as expected. The same goes for Albrighton, who has been a little found out this season. Can McLeish be blamed for losing top quality wingers and replacing them with average ones? And has Darren Bent suffered because of the change in quality? Of course he has. McLeish's signings have been poor though, Hutton is just not good enough for the Premier League and his creative midfielder Jenas got injured after 20 minutes. 

A time of cuts

Randy Lerner wanted to cut the wage bill and stressed this last summer. Why? Because Lerner gambled on taking Villa to the Champions League and although we were so close, the gap between the top and the rest is larger than he realised and is even further now. It would be folly to try to compete for a top four finish now, especially with City and Tottenham creating a new top six. This is the issue at Villa now, under Ellis we were sustainable, he was sensible with the wages and we lived within our means.

This last financial year Villa reported losses of £54 million despite the sales of Young and Downing. The year before suffering losses of more than £37million. Villa saw wages increase to almost £80 million in 2009/10, an increase of £9million and they now account for 88% of the club's £90million turnover. This is staggering and it is understandable why changes need to be made.

Robin Russell, Villa's chief financial officer, said: "The board is confident that the actions taken since the end of the 2010-11 financial year have galvanised the longer-term sustainability of the club and have given us a better financial platform on which to build for future success."

This means that we have sold our assets and will continue to, will need to reduce the wage bill and ultimately it means times of mediocrity are abound. This should not been as a negative but a lesson to what we did wrong for the past five years. I agree with a sustainable model of running a club, yet it will require major changes next season.

We stay up, what now?

So we cannot aim to get into the top eight, so we must be content with maintaining our top flight status and doing it sustainably. The wage bill needs does need to be cut; we have players on simply ludicrous wages which should never have been justified or approved. McLeish agreed to come into a situation which was more precarious than many believed, which no-one else wanted. The lack of money to reinvest, the lack of strength in the side and the constant changes had destabilised the side. It was seen by many managers as a sinking ship, so credit to McLeish whose job it was to get Villa back to sustainable levels.

I think McLeish is a decent man and one who has done admirably this season. I am sure he will keep Villa up and the fans should praise him for that. However, I do believe that he has to go this summer. The situation is untenable and I just cannot see that changing in the near future. Will the fans accept him and support the club with the ferocity they did? Doubtful. What needs to happen is a new man must come in to galvanise the club. McLeish should be given a golden handshake for his handling of a precarious situation and Villa can then move on.

There is one man who Villa should get over any other, and this is Paul Lambert. He has proven, with a drive and determination that not many managers possess, that he can take a side languishing in league 1 and take them to the top league in two years, and keep them there. He is made for the top echelons of the game and Villa would do good to get him. He has shown at Norwich that he can bring in players cheaply on low wages and bring out the best of their abilities. This will be key for Villa aiming for sustainability.

This summer Emile Heskey, Carlos Cuellar and  Brad Guzan’s deals run out this summer. Villa need to convince Cuellar especially that he has a future at Villa, as a centre back. He is the best centre half we have and has been wasted playing at full back for the past seasons. Guzan is good enough to be Given’s replacement, yet Heskey must go. In his time at Villa he hasn’t been played to his strengths; he is an excellent target man who can bring players into the game,  yet the players around him don’t link up with him well enough or he plays in midfield. We have wasted three years of his career and now he is suited only to the Championship.

Other members of the squad should be moved on too; Warnock has been very poor, and Houllier’s reluctance to play him last season appears justified, apparently O’Neill wants to take him to Sunderland, let’s hope so. I also don’t believe that Richard Dunne and James Collins have a place in the team anymore, since O’Neill left they have not played to their best and they only getting worse. They just doesn’t justify their high wages. Habib Beye needs moving on too, another poor O’Neill signing.

I have been very disappointed with Fabian Delph, again another overpriced English player signed by O’Neill. He was bought for £8.5 million and a lot was expected of him, yet he has been very poor. I am sure the injury contributed to his loss of pace and movement yet I don’t see a top flight midfielder in him. We would be lucky to get £2 million for him, yet I am sure a Championship side would take a look.

Stephen Ireland has been a surprise this season, although he has not played remarkably, but he has contributed more than expected and this should be pleasing to us; because hopefully we can look to move him on and get more for him. In his time at Villa he has been a negative influence on the team and we do not need this type of player in these new austere times.
Warnock and Ireland have been used because their wages were too high to not use them, players being paid well should be contributing, and although they have played a part this season I don’t see them in the long term vision of Villa.

The big move may have to be Darren Bent. A prolific goalscorer there is no doubt and his record is impressive, yet his attitude and demeanour has not been of a man who enjoys playing at Villa and he appears more to be the one “left behind” in the summer exodus. He kept us up last season yet I don’t believe he does enough when he doesn’t have the support; his hold up play is poor and he doesn’t move into the channels well enough. I think if we can get £20 million for him then we would be doing good business. There will be sides like Liverpool who would take him from us in their search to find a natural goalscorer.

It is a time to be excited more than disheartened.

All this talk of players leaving and cutting wages sounds disheartening, however there is a good core of young players at Villa who are beginning to get their taste of senior football. They have not disappointed, and it may be that the future at Villa will require more of the academy and emphasis on producing home grown players. This is a positive step forward and this current crop may be the best Villa has ever produced.

Bryan Jones, Academy Manager said that “I think people recognise that if you are not a Manchester City or a Chelsea with bucketloads of cash the only way to survive is by producing your own players."

Against Liverpool at Anfield there were six players aged under 23 and who had been brought through the academy; Lichaj, Bannan, Baker, Weimann, Gardner and Carruthers all played a part in the 1-1 draw. With players like Weimann, Callum Robinson, Daniel Johnson, Michael Drennan, Graham Burke and Jordan Graham with bright futures playing regularly in the reserve league and tasting success and with those like Albrighton, Delfouneso and Agbonlahor who have come through in the past several years, then Villa may find their sustainable model more than easier to achieve.

This season Villa entered into a U19 tournament called the NextGen series, a tournament where youth players can experience something similar to the Champions League. It was a great experience for the players to play against some of best youth sides in Europe, and their class showed. Villa beat Ajax, Rosenborg and Fenerbahce en route to the last eight, they went out to a 2-1 extra time defeat to Marseille in the quarter finals. The players involved would have got a lot of valuable experience from that tournament and we are seeing them coming through now.

And the reserve side, which contains many of the potential senior players, has won the southern league again, which makes it four wins out of five seasons, a great achievement and a strong indication that there is a bright future for many of the Villa youngsters. Led by Kevin MacDonald they clearly show the potential to be part of the Villa senior side.

Weimann believes developing young players is a major part of Villa’s identity, now more than ever before. It must be the foundation, where Villa can develop a group of players who are part of the club, who cost relatively little and perhaps if needs must, are sold for profit. This is the key to being sustainable.

A new time of sustainability

The new philosophy of Villa is about cutting costs and being sustainable. Many may argue this is a remedy for relegation, I don’t agree. It can be done if the management, the scouting and board are all working together. Look at Everton, in the past six years they have a net spend of £9 million. This is incredible. Villa in fact are the fifth ranked side behind Man City, Chelsea, Liverpool and Tottenham. Spending has not resulted in success. 

The truth is that the money spent did not reflect in the quality of players brought in; Lerner got it wrong trusting O’Neill to achieve that top four finish. Of course we had talent yet they have moved on and the side needs to move on from the O’Neill era where we now have too many average players on the books with high wages who are bringing down the finances and not contributing on the pitch. The O’Neill era consisted of frivolous spending and giving average players top quality wages, this is not sustainable.

Everton and now Newcastle have shown that the right management and a good scouting network can lead to success on the pitch and can be sustainable to the finances of the squad. We are in times of austerity and clubs need to plan for the future as well as the present. It is a difficult time at Villa now, the time of lavish spending is over and the type of player who is realistic to us has changed. 

What is required is simple really; know what you want and how you are going to achieve it. If you want sustainable growth then you need to focus on bringing in good players for cheap. This is where scouting is a major factor; Newcastle have done superbly with their scouting of players like Tiote, Cabaye and Cisse. Everton have brought through players like Jagielka, Cahill and Arteta for little money also. And they have been successful by spending less. 

Many Villa fans want the club to spend big, that they believe will be the answer to everything. What this enables is perhaps short term gain but little long term success or sustainability. It is easy to throw money around, yet Villa cannot do that now. Look at Bolton, they are in £90 million of debt and relegation beckons, this is a side who invested beyond their means and may face the consequences of their indulgent and ambitious ways. Villa cannot allow themselves to do this.

Can we challenge for the top, perhaps like Newcastle we could go for the top four again, in a few years maybe, but we need to do it the right way. The key for this has to be with the right man in charge, it will need everyone supporting the side and contributing their part, with McLeish there, this will not happen and the consequence will be relegation. This cannot be allowed to happen.

Paul Lambert is my choice to take Villa on, I look at his old Dortmund side and see the work that Jurgen Klopp has done there today and believe that Lambert is the same type of man, with tactical skills to go along with his excellent management abilities, he has shown he can lead a team of players and galvanise a club which lost its way.  This is the man that Lerner needs in order to implement his sustainable model and get the fans back on his side. 


A time of austerity is upon Villa, yet it doesn't mean doom and gloom, it may actually be just what we need to get the club back on track.

I appreciate any feedback you have and you can get me on Twitter at @The_W_Address



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Villa, the 'transfer' safer and expected


David Villa is walking without crutches after fracturing the tibia on December 15 in the semis World Cup Clubs. The Asturian, whose recovery is going well, he is expected in late April in the crucial stretch.

But either then or in the next league, 'Guaje' is the 'transfer' most coveted by Pep. It has nothing to do with this' operation attack ". Ensures -23 goals in his first year and 9 in 24 games in the second-, has assimilated the Barça system, provides quality and rapport with Messi is total. (via MD)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

The unfortunate truth about Aston Villa

The delusions of granduer at Villa Park needs to be replaced with realism




Thursday February 26th 2009 is a defining moment in the recent history of Aston Villa. This is when Villa travelled to Moscow for the 2nd leg of the Uefa Cup, they lost 2-0. 

It was not the result necessarily which mattered, it was the fact that Martin O’Neill decided to leave the majority of the first at home in order to rest for the Premier league game against Stoke. The consequences of this decision were seen the rest of the season. The following game Villa were winning 2-0 against Stoke in the 90th minute. O’Neill’s decision to rest players for the league appeared vindicated. And then Stoke scored twice. 

Since then Villa went on a run of four losses, against Man City, Spurs, Liverpool and that famous game where Macheda put himself on the map with a 3-2 loss to United. Three draws followed and only two more wins came that season. It was a capitulation of Keegan proportions and effectively set the future for Villa.

Martin O’Neill was brought in by Doug Ellis as a farewell gift to the fans, his appointment certainly galvanised the Villa Park faithful who had become rather subdued under O’Leary. A brand of high tempo counter attack football got not just Villa fans purring and the side looked like potential dark horses for the top four.

O’Neill had one crack at it the following season, another 6th place finish meant Europa League and losses in the League Cup final and FA cup semi final meant no silverware again. It was the end of the project and the end of O’Neill’s reign.

Randy Lerner invested £100 million in transfer fees under O’Neill and paid high wages to many players who perhaps did not warrant such high earnings. He recouped only £20 million in O’Neill’s reign meaning a loss of over £80 million with no silverware or Champions League football to show for it. His project had ultimately failed and perhaps his reluctance to bank roll another season under O’Neill or his realisation that the need to balance the books was a necessity led to the departure of O’Neill.

The unfortunate truth

With that brief piece of history the aim of this article is to show that Villa are not a big club and that those who believe that Villa should be fighting for Champions League football are delusional. We had a chance in that 08/09 season, yet it was destroyed by poor management and a lack of transfer activity and ambition. That team has been gradually broken up  and what is left is nothing like a team which could only ever achieve sixth place anyway.

Villa have a great history of success, one of only four English sides to win the European Cup is a great achievement. They are showered with domestic success in leagues and cups and when considering a team’s history, they are certainly up there.

However, it is important to realise that history is just that and what is key is the present day. In all honesty, being realisitic, Aston Villa are a mid table side who are certainly good enough to stay in the league yet are not good enough to move any higher.

The unfortunate truth is that just four years ago sides like Man City and Spurs were regarded as our equals, now they are much better then Villa. Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool although having mixed seasons still have more money and are much more attractive clubs for players than a team in the midlands. Below these sides Villa are one of many. This is the unfortunate truth.

High ambition, delusion of grandeur

Many Villa fans believe that if Spurs are up there then we should be too. In 2009 I would not have argued with that, however Spurs have done a great job of buying good young players with potential and developing them into top level players; Bale, Modric and Lennon are good examples of their policy. What is the key, and the biggest difference between Villa is that these players are still there now.

Villa’s young players like Young, Downing and Milner have all moved on, making profit on each one sure, but with no real replacements to fill the void. N’Zogbia has not impressed and is certainly no replacement for both Young and Downing.

Villa also have many good youngsters; Albrighton, Delfounso, Gardner, Bannan and Clark. Yet are these players of the level required to take Villa to the top four? No. This is not a criticism of them or the club. What this article is trying to stress is that these players are a reflection of the club.


Since Lerner and Co. have been given licence to choose the manager the decisions have not been of the benefit to the team and instead they strike at a certain level of admission that the initial hope of taking Villa to the top four was not as possible as they once believed. 

The point is, Villa fans have complained all year about the appointment of McLeish, they have protested and booed and have made Villa a horrible and lifeless place to be a fan. The players have admitted the atmosphere has affected them and results have shown that the negativity at Villa Park has had a negative effect. Villa rank 14th in the league at home this year and 9th away, this is a sign of worry yet should not be a surprise if you attend games at home.

The fans have been quick to blame the manager for the poor performances this season, yet we have conceded less goals this season and have the same points.  If the plan with McLeish is long term, which it appears to be, then I don’t believe building a strong foundation from defence is a bad decision. Even though a comparison with Man City is rather ludicrous, Mancini made sure his side was defensively solid before he looked to let them play more expansive football. Under Houilier the team was too open and ultimately porous and if it wasn’t for Bent being supplied by Young and Downing then the team would have been close to relegation.

Who wants the job? 

It is hilarious to outsiders yet embarrassing for fans when Villa fans talk of new managers; they make outlandish predictions and hold out hope that a Champions League manager would want to come to Villa. Those who lusted for O’Neill back or for those big name managers in the game like Rijkaard need to understand that this is not the same team as before. 

The truth is that McLeish inherited a group of players which lacked the ability to break the top eight yet alone top four. He came in knowing he would have limited funds and would be required to slash the wage bill. He has been subjected to abuse all year and yet has not faltered in his belief in the job. Managers like Martinez and even perhaps Benitez rejected that this job as it was not appealing, limited money and an ageing, demotivated side did fill these men with appetite.

Fans need to realise that Villa is not regarded as a big club anymore, esteemed with history sure, but it is not a big player in the world today. We are like the British Empire, small in size, yet used to be very successful. And like the country now, we continue to lust over the old times, believing we are still a big player in the affairs of the world.

In McLeish we have a man who looked at the Villa job as an honour, even when understanding and considering the major risks of taking the job. He has persevered and has done his job well enough. Those thought we would be relegated are now proved wrong, we will not be relegated this season. 

Yet instead of thanking him for his work he has been subjected to abuse. This team have come out of turmoil, have lost top players and yet the manager in place has steadied the ship and ridden out the storm.

Are Villa appealing?

Fans have spoken of getting Lambert or Rodgers from Swansea, two managers who have shown their credentials this season and for me must be regarded as the best two young managers in the UK at this time. 

However, in my opinion Lambert is too good to manage Villa; his skills demonstrate the ability to coach Bayern or his old side Dortmund, if Klopp ever goes. He has credentials of top level management and I would not be surprised if Ferguson was keeping tabs on this young Scotsman for his future seat. My point being is that Lambert’s next move will be bigger than Villa. 

As for Rodgers, his style of football is excellent, and it has been a joy to watch this season. However, his failing at Reading indicated that his success is dependent on the players he has. His way of playing is similar to Houillier last season, which was a remedy for disaster. The Swansea team he inherited were made for this style thanks to Martinez, Villa do not have the personnel or the time to develop this style and so I do not believe Rodgers and Villa would be a good mix.

Support the man and the club

You will probably argue that we are where are because of McLeish. Yet, what would other managers have done with this team? Top four? Really. If you believe that then you are doing a disservice to the club. We are only four points off eighth place and so to say that we are underachieving is ludicrous. 


It is the fans who need to ask questions of theirsevles, imagine if those games at home where negativity was abound and every bad touch was groaned at was replaced with positivity. Negativity this season cannot have helped the team. Imagine if support had been like other clubs, proud to be supporting their team, instead of sitting their reluctant to support anything be it deemed as support for McLeish.


Is changing the manager a good thing?

Many have wanted a change of manager all season, yet when you look at the teams who have changed manager have they really benefitted? It is very difficult to come in to a team in a relegation battle, especially during or after January.  Remember Newcastle, who believed that an inexperienced manager in Shearer could lead them to survival, they were wrong. Ian Dowie was brought in at Hull, however, as with his record, he took them down. 

Credit to Sunderland who did their work before Christmas and that decision was the right one.
Yet at QPR Mark Hughes, a man with no real relegation battle experience, a man who many Villa fans wanted last season has realised the pressures and difficulties of keeping up a side like QPR. The Hoops' league record since he took over reads W1 D2 L5 and unless he can mastermind a dramatic revival, they're doomed to the Championship.

Another side who decided their man had to go was Wolves, with the chaos that ensued from there, the lack of a plan for a credible replacement and perhaps the restricted means offered to a new man, they have reaped what they sow and are another side deep in the relegation mire.

And what about those great managers in Coyle and Martinez. The media will have you believe that they play some beautiful football, pass and move stuff like Barcelona. Yet the reality is they cannot defend and they lack the leadership required to stay in the league. Are they doing better than McLeish? No.

They have been squandering at the bottom all year and they have had longer to build “their” team also. You will say that Bolton and Wigan aren’t bigger than Villa so of course they should be there, but these managers have shown they are incapable of improving their sides and relegation is a very possible thing for both. 

It is funny when pundits criticise teams like Stoke when they are stable in the league and yet commend the team at the bottom for their style, David Pleat believes Roberto Martínez's faith in his system hints at brighter future for Wigan. Sure it does, in the Championship.

Personally I also hope that Steve Kean is able to survive this season; the abuse that fans believe they can direct at their manager’s is utter disgrace and if he does keep them up then it is truly a testament to his character and drive. He has brought through many young players this season and should be commended for this, not lambasted. The Blackburn fans don’t deserve him and he should leave as soon as they are announced safe.

Look at all these clubs, we are not in their situation. The board have stuck by their decision, they have not acted rashly and we have come out of it. If we put some results together we could finish in the top half. It is the constant negativity and pessimism which frustrates me at Villa. Why do we believe we are better than we are? We haven't won the league since 1981, yet fans demand success. It is craziness.

A new dawn

Do not blame McLeish for this season, sure he has made mistakes yet doesn’t everyone.  I look at the fans and wonder if they really are supportive of this team, because if they are they need to realise that he will be there next season, that is evident, and so instead of licking your wounds and being spiteful why not come out and support the team. If our home record was anything like our away form then perhaps we could have been higher this year.

Fans will say that he got Blues relegated twice, yet think what you are saying. Are Blues good enough for the Premiership? No. So it was always going to be difficult to keep a team like that in the top flight. We need to realise that we are better than Blues, and so saying we will get relegated with McLeish is like saying we are the same as Blues. This is not true. We have not been relegated once in the Premier League and we shall not be this season.

 Do I want Villa to invest millions into the side to make them a title chasing side? It is hard not to look at City and be jealous, watching that kind of talent each week must be a joy. However, we do not have an Arab investor and most likely won’t have one soon. We have a relatively wealthy yet not silly businessman who has invested money into the side with no real returns. He realises the gulf between the sides at the top and understands that the gap between and money needed to bridge it is not possible or sustainable.  


 The false beliefs and delusions of grandeur have hindered progress and enjoyment of this season. Be realistic, O’Neill, that wonderful manager only ever achieved a sixth place finish, and that was with high investment. Let us respect and be proud of our history yet now be realistic about who and what we now are. Perhaps by doing this we can support the club and allow Villa Park to be an enjoyable place to be again. McLeish now has a summer to build his team, we must join together and support him in his plan. 


The Whitehouse Address is on Twitter @The_W_Address



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments

Protests at Villa Park will only result in relegation


How the fans protests will only lead to disastrous consequences for Aston Villa.


One only has to look at the treatment of Steve Kean at Blackburn to realise that protests have no positive effect on a team. All it leads to is self-fulfilling prohecies of relegation. This weekend the Aston Villa fans have arranged for a protest before the game against Alex McLeish. They believe that with him in charge the team will be relegated like Birmingham were last season. Understandably they are worried, however, is this kind of action going to galvanise a team that is lacking in self-confidence and belief?

There is a common belief that in order to stay in the league home form is vital. So when comparing results between home and away this season, Villa have picked up more points away and rank as the 8thbest team. However their home form has resulted in 5 losses and they rank at 14th. They have scored less at home than away and have not won in 6 games. Why are Villa performing worse at home than away? As much as the manager and players can be blamed, I believe that the fans play a major part in how this season will turn out.

Is McLeish lacking the motivational skills necessary to inspire a team clearly lacking a buzz or are the players to fault for their own performances? It really comes down to both, yet the biggest factor at fault is the fans. This constant negativity and lack of support, especially in home games, is a remedy for disaster. Players feed off the atmosphere and all too often this season Villa Park has resembled a morque more than a football stadium. It is no surprise that Villa perform better away, away from the negativity, receiving constant support and noise from a continued passionate support. It is sad when a team is better away because they are away from the criticism of their own “faithful”.

People will argue that success breeds a positive atmosphere, however is it not more likely that success comes from the support of the fans. Under O’Neill the atmosphere at Villa Park was electric and it clearly galvanised the team. When comparing attendances from last season to this one the crowd has gone down, the atmosphere is dropped. Since McLeish took over there has been a belief from the off that he was not the right man for the job. And some fans have refused to support the man at the helm. This attitude is not going to do anything but lead the team to relegation, how ironic would it be that the fans who believe we will be relegated will effectively create a self-fulfilling prophecy through their lack of support for the manager and thus the team.

When the fans boo the team it becomes counter-productive, during the summer the fans moaned about every manager Villa were linked to and in their unrealistic expectations of who and where Villa are. Under Martin O’Neill Villa’s best finish was 6th, yet this is completely unrealistic now as Spurs and Man City are stronger than they were and Villa are weaker. In O’Neill’s reign he was given high wages and transfer fees. It can be argued that it is through these high wages and poor transfer decisions that the present problems at Villa have been created. The fans should respect McLeish for taking a job that he knew would require cutting the wage bill, selling players and buying only with a small transfer budget, how can he try to emulate O’Neill?

It is important to note this is a difficult period for Villa, they have invested a lot in the last few seasons and yet came up short, this has resulted in losing good players and have possessing too many old and overpaid ones. McLeish has been brought in to steady what was a volatile ship and what the fans need to do is support the team, create a positive atmosphere. The team that O’Neill had is nothing like what McLeish has at his disposal. Yet the fans appear not to recognise this, they believe he should be performing to O’Neill’s level, even though McLeish has almost no budget for players and has been forced to reduce the wage bill. The current team need the fans on their side.

Many fans will argue that his style of play is negative, that it is too defensive. Yet so was O’Neill, he played counter attack football every game, yet had the personnel to implement it effectively. McLeish has not been given this luxury. McLeish inherited a team of ageing, overpaid players and in fairness his own signings have not been good enough; N’Zogbia has not performed as expected; as good as he is when on form, he suffers from a terrible lack of consistency and if you watched Wigan play these past few years you would realise that his signing was not going to replace both Young and Downing. Alan Hutton has showed that he is a Championship player at best and Jenas was unfortunate to get injured so early as he could have done a good job for Villa. It is only Given who has shown his worth.  His decision to continue play Warnock must be questioned as he is proving to be liable to a mistake and goal in every goal at this time.

A real positive for Villa is that they do have an excellent youth system which contains real talent which O’Neill chose to ignore. Barry Bannan’s comments were very interesting regarding O’Neill. He has brought out more from Ireland and is playing Cuellar at centre back which is better for the team and they possess a real gem in Gary Gardner. What the team needs to do is get through this season and build from there. 

Do the fans really want Villa relegated? By their actions it would appear so, perhaps if these the protesters want to see improved results they should try supporting their side instead, McLeish is not going anywhere.  I believe that those who protest don’t actually support the team at all because real support goes through good and bad, if they want the players to give 100% then they should too. There are some very poor teams in this league and Villa are much better than Birmingham were, with total support of the fans relegation should not be an issue.


  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
0Comments
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...